"Black History Month" and "true American history" are antonyms

The original story is that in Utah parents have the right to pull their children from overly politicized classroom instruction, which is of course all that "black history month" is all about. Some Democrat is very upset that parents are given power over the state, and wants to bring about his preferred political system. You know, the one that failed everywhere it was tried, including North Korea where a vicious group of thugs known as the Viet Cong murdered and raped innocents in order to enact this failed system. On a totally unrelated note...

He’s probably incapable of ever understanding of what the word “communist” truly is, if stopping white people preventing their children from learning true American History is communism then man he’s in for a deep reality check

— Viet Cong ☭ (@henry_ly_19) February 7, 2021

"True American history" of course doesn't involve a lot of communism. It includes some communism, and slightly more blacks, but that's not really a useful measure now is it?

Of course if white parents want their children to learn true history no public school will be the best option. After all, that's where they are taught lies.

If we're talking truth, how about how white civilizations (thankfully) spread across the planet due to the inherent superiority of the systems they had developed. Like it or not, in 1715 countries that adopted aspects of the Dutch system were better off than the ones who adopted aspects of the Joseon dynasty or the Ahmed III Ottomans. The reason the United States of America was so successful was because at this time the Dutch and British and to a lesser extent French and Spanish systems are what came over. To tie it back to black history month, the reason American slaves were the luckiest on earth was also because of those systems.

There's your reality check henry. Enjoy.