Leftists are so unhinged these days that they're denouncing what they claim to be their most cherished positions.
Okay, cowardly Leigh isn't the first case of this, and hardly the last: but the Wuhan Flu even more than the God Emperor Donald Trump years has really laid their sick mindset bare.Are you willing to sign a document stating that you refuse all COVID treatment in the event you contract the virus?
— Leigh is inflamed. (@leighfromcanada) January 15, 2021
So now if you publicly disagree with government policy, as Roman Baber courageously did, then you sacrifice what they claim is your "universal human right to free healthcare"? Even by Viro Fascist standards that's some pretty sick imposing your will on those you pretend to be champions for.
The "promise" of government rationed healthcare, such as it is, is that sure you are robbed your entire life to pay for it, and sure it means that medical professionals are essentially slaves, and sure you'll quite possibly die waiting to get it because it turns out public healthcare always means a perpetual shortage, and sure no matter how much money gets pumped into the Ponzi scheme eventually it's going to bankrupt your country... but in return, you get at least some level of healthcare. Theoretically the same coverage as everybody else, including what decisions in life you have made and how that might change your value to society. [try not to think very hard about NHL players in this environment though! -ed]
Because after all, if Leigh wants people who publicly speak out against useless Kung Flu lockdowns to "voluntarily" sign on to refuse healthcare related to their actions, why should fake faggot marriage licenses also require signing off on refusing treatment for AIDS (or damage to their face caused by the fathers of the underage boys they molest)? When you buy pot in the government store should you also be asked to sign away healthcare for the lung cancer you're going to be getting? Ski and snowboard enthusiasts asked to waive treatment for their broken bones?
But let's not stop here: after all, if we've already signed onto Leigh's plan of denying the "human right to universal healthcare" based on actions you've taken (like Baber's public comments), then what about other actions taken that you could argue (as I'm sure Leigh does about her argument) are 'contrary to the public good' or whatever socialist mantra you want to apply it to? I'm talking, of course, about whether or not a patient is a benefit to society: as measured, in the only way such a thing is possible, by how much cash they earn in a calendar year. If Baber criticizing lockdowns and quarantine camps is deemed so detrimental to society that his healthcare should be taken away, what do you call getting no higher education (or a useless degree) and meandering around in a minimum wage job? Why should we be paying for their healthcare -- and after all, it is "we" since low income people don't generally pay much in income taxes to begin with -- when healing them probably isn't worth our while?
Who knew that the entire philosophical tenant behind mandatory government-funded healthcare could be so easily demolished? All it takes is one cowardly leftist who disagrees with a superior conservative argument?
Related: A different leftist slut who can't handle having her ideas challenged decided that public healthcare is so vitally important that the entire medical profession should become slaves in order to provide every single person every bit of 'healthcare' they could ever want no matter what.
Also related: If Baber or anybody else could only seek private healthcare in Canada in the first place...
