Trump v. DeSantis

Somebody get Zack Snyder on the phone. Meanwhile, Robin Itzler reviews the pros and cons of each from a laid back and rational perspective:

It’s still very early in the cycle, but my guess is that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis will not run for president. Many voters do not like a governor who was just re-elected walking away from the job, especially when the election was a few months before the announcement.

In Florida, officeholders running for federal office must resign their position. It’s being reported that the legislature is quietly preparing to change the law. Although Florida Statute 99.012 has wiggle room, having it changed solely to benefit DeSantis would be seen by many as an unethical perversion of legislative power. Should DeSantis resign, Lt. Governor Jeanette Nunez would become governor. Those relocating to Florida primarily because of how DeSantis runs the Sunshine state should start researching Nunez.

"Let’s turn toward each other with all the compassion that savage animal gave Mollie"

John Hays in the wake of that horrible video from last week showing an uppity nigger harassing an innocent white.

Western whites now accept levels of criminality no other well-established people in the world would tolerate and would have been unthinkable in the U.S., for instance, just a half century ago. And Christian moral teachings aren’t the reasons. Rather, a kind of mind virus has infected brainwashed whites desperate to avoid placing blame where it belongs. The consequences are self-destructive and anarchic.
For cognitive tranquility, whites must ascribe inherent goodness to non-whites, effectively placing them on a pedestal. That requires treating criminal non-whites as disconnected individuals, as representative of the human race and its general condition.

Thus when a non-white group exhibits unignorable crimes or other bad behavior that can be empirically observed and statistically quantified—such as a murder rate out of proportion with their share of the population—whites blame the “legacy” of racism, colonialism, or white supremacy.

Forgetting, of course, that blacks back in Blackrifca were less violent during the height of colonialism.
This psychology is also manifest among West Europeans. “Migrants” from Africa and the Middle East are committing unprecedented levels of rape and other sex assaults upon local women, which police and the Main Stream Media have of course either ignored or covered up. Pattern recognition has been deemed racist.

@JodiKoberinski - Be more like us. Be better.

Jodi "explores tensions between commodification and commons in the context of colonial settler state extractivism within occupied Indigenous territories".

As a result, Jodi Koberinski is inferior to every single group and individual named in her tweet. She can and must be changed to be better. Or else.


He Admires Their Basic Dictatorship

I mentioned this last week, but worth a full review: Bill C-18 Motion Establishes a Dangerous Precedent For Those Who Dare to Oppose Legislation.

The year is 2025 and a newly elected Pierre Poilievre government moves to implement one of its earliest campaign promises by repealing Bill C-11. Creator groups, who spent years lobbying for the bill and participating in CRTC hearings, plan protests given their concerns that the changes will extend beyond user content by limiting potential contributions from foreign streaming sites. The Poilievre government brands the protests “subversive” and an act of intimidation designed to stop legislation from moving forward. In response, it demands that the groups disclose “any and all internal or external communications (including but not limited to emails, texts or other forms of messages) related to actions it planned to take or options it considered in relation” to the legislation.

The Newspaper of Record

Grand Jury Canceled As DA Unable To Find Any Jurors Awesome Enough To Be Trump's Peers

"As a totally non-corrupt, Soros-backed District Attorney who respects the rule of law as applied to political enemies, It was important to make sure Trump was indicted by a jury of his peers," said Bragg. "After searching high and low, we soon found out that Trump has zero peers. This is due to how beautiful, fantastic, and powerful he is. He has no equal. We're honestly not sure what to do now."

Sources confirmed the Manhattan DA office conducted a thorough search of the whole of New York City, and after several days was unable to find even one person who could match Trump in terms of raw, unadulterated power, intellect, and hand size.


@10KZCelly - It's called being superior

They still keep bitching and lying about pay equity. It's the same thing chicks do about pretty much everything in life, from whether or not they spent too much money at the mall to how the car accident really happened. So it's really not surprising when it comes to their income versus their value to an employer they bitch and lie about that too.

Hey, maybe that's why we don't pay you as much.

Of course, the whole 83% thing has been disproven so badly so many times that the only reason these sluts keep bringing it up is because they are actively evil and not just retarded. There's the mathematical approach, the cultural approach [pdf], the economics approach, and my personal favourite: the "here you go you dumb slut, here's your extra money and whoops you accidentally got a metal pipe through your skull" approach.

This was recently in the news again when FakePresident Biden got a supposed letter from a child complaining about the (fake) pay gap. Little Charlotte was very sad that "men are getting more money than girls". In addition to being guided by the feminist lie about the pay gap, one of the striking things that nobody seems to ever want to ask is why they are, and whether or not this should be celebrated.


Modern cops are so shitty they can't even successfully frame George "Gorilla" Floyd

Steven Sailor: the Memphis cops are the result of what the "systemic racism is a problem even though there's literally no evidence for it" crowd asked for a decade earlier.

Since Ferguson nine years ago, American elites have been obsessing over their paranoid delusions about invisible and largely imaginary “systemic racism,” while ignoring the basic blocking and tackling of how to assemble a police force that makes more good decisions than bad decisions under stress: hire recruits with the raw intelligence and conscientiousness to become well-trained, and then train them hard.

For instance, because courts have never dared apply to the military the 1972 Griggs decision making it harder to use IQ-like hiring exams, the Pentagon has an utterly immense data set documenting how testing and training work together in improving on-the-job performance.

But almost nobody in positions of influence during the BLM era could remember that quality potential police officers are scarce, especially black ones.

After all, it’s racist to notice realities that don’t conform to the Narrative. On Monday, for instance, The New York Times began its listing of Penn law professor Amy Wax’s speechcrimes with:

Amy Wax, a law professor, has said publicly that “on average, Blacks have lower cognitive ability than whites…”
Now, you know and I know that’s likely the most thoroughly documented fact in all of American social science. But nobody else remembers that anymore. And what is unsayable eventually becomes inconceivable.

The conventional wisdom during the Great Awokening has assumed that high-potential but underemployed black workers were available in practically infinite supply due to severe discrimination against competent blacks.

Granted, that’s been an absurd idea since some point in the 1960s.

But you may disagree. You may have evidence. But, ask yourself, is it worth losing your job as tenured professor Amy Wax seems likely to?

“We would voice our concerns, and it would go on deaf ears,” said James Lash, a former academy instructor and Crisis Intervention Team coordinator for the Memphis department who retired in 2022. “There were several officers in that group [that beat] Tyre Nichols that everybody wondered about when they were in the academy. You reap what you sow.”

And since diversity hires are always inferior to the white resume you passed over, people die as a result.

Possibly unrelated: how did a curiously-racially-anonymous 16 year old kid successfully ambush and kill two Edmonton cops and nobody seems interested in where he got the gun?


@JoanR73 - You can't find any men who aren't straw though

Really? "No one" is saying that?

After all, systemic racism has been blamed as the cause for...let's see here...

And the list goes on and on and on. That none of these examples (even in the case of contradictory ones!) prove the thesis is irrelevant to these people. It's probably easier to find an inequality that isn't being blamed on racism.

Yet that's all fine and good, but can Joan name a single example of "systemic racism" that's newer than the first Star Wars movie? We ask over and over and over again and somehow your lot never can provide a single example.

It's time for the Edmonton Oilers to apologize in their complicity in murder

Last Saturday, the Oilers became the latest NHL team to host an Evil Sodomite (but I repeat myself) Appreciation Night.

Today, a mentally ill tranny (but I repeat myself) apparently shot and killed three staff and three students [the latter likely targeted after turning it down for sex! -ed] before (possibly, some reports say it was police fire) turning the gun on itself.

Fog of war and all, it's also currently unclear if the supposed suspect is a dude who thinks he's a chick or the other way around

So it's time for the Oilers to take remedial action in order to atone for their crimes on Saturday.

First off, one night every season needs to be declared as LEVITICUS 18:22 NIGHT where the team wraps black and grey tape around their sticks, and endless newspaper articles are written up whenever any player dares to request to not participate.

Secondly, they need to cancel a game. I mean they have lots of games where they seem to think a game hasn't happened, but I mean full on cancel a game in response to this horrible tragedy committed by a follower of the invalid lifestyle choice you just finished promoting! You might scoff, but it's been done before: they literally cancelled a game a couple years back after some criminal got deservedly shot by police.

If a domestic abusing rapist like Jacob Blake is worth cancelling games, imagine how many games need to be cancelled due to the tragic loss of six lives. Zach Laing strangely enough hasn't written any articles yet chastizing the team for failing to be a leader in fighting for justice. Maybe he's on vacation this week.

So hurry up and not play, boys. These innocent Christians have their blood on your faggy-taped-up sticks.

Related: This might be suicide-by-cop, and seeing how trannies are inherently suicidal by virtue of being completely mentally off the wall, one wonders how many of them are going to start trying asymmetrical warfare on people with families and lives worth living for.

@cathynhouston says it's okay to shoot niggers who break your window


@jimmymac1 - What a coincidence!

"You don't have a real heart so ending what sounds like a heartbeat isn't an issue" is what I told the last faggot who I left barely conscious laying in a ditch.


A good first step

NHL Teams quietly scale back on the rainbow jerseys

The Minnesota Wild scrapped its plans for players to wear rainbow-themed warm-up jerseys during Pride celebrations.

The Pride Night celebrations were still held by the Wild, which issued this statement: “The Minnesota Wild organization is proud to continue our support for the LGBTQIA+ community by hosting our second annual pride night, which we are celebrating in many ways. It is important to host nights like this to show all players, fans, and the LGBTQIA+ community that hockey is for everyone."

Last month, the New York Islanders’ players did not wear Pride jerseys in warm-up, something that has been team policy for some time. Team captain Anders Lee spoke publicly for the Islanders, saying, “For us here in this room, we take care of what we can here and obviously are very supportive of the LGBTQ+ community and do what we can to include them in our game,” Lee told the New York Post.

Of course, a better second step is stop promoting the evil and inferior lifestyle choice which is sodomy.


@muddybike - Pay your bills

It's above zero almost every day in Edmonton this week, so you might be thinking about outdoor activities. Chances are, though, you still want to do indoor activities and drive there in your vehicle so you don't have to deal with the worth-exactly-zero-human-filth that you'll find in public transit.

Then you get the pathetic bike activists like Bobby McPherson, who demands it be made even more expensive and annoying to try and navigate in the vehicle you bought in order to improve your life. In this particular case he freaked out over a local political candidate even suggesting that bike lanes shouldn't be the priority.

That this freeloading moron isn't taxed at 99% of his income should be to the shame of all the people of the world. Those of us who drive pay fuel taxes, licensing fees, and all sorts of infrastructure to both pay for the public roadways which depend on us (unlike vice versa for you) are then forced to pay for unused bike lanes (and their insane maintenance) by lazy and unaccountable folks (who typically are the people public policy should favour the least) like you.

We can do better. We can start forcing bicycles on public roadways to be licensed and registered to owners, with harsh enforcement and heavy penalties for noncompliance with traffic rules.

You disgusting people did it to us, now live under your own regime.


Newsflash: all Muslim immigrants are trash

Finland is learning it the hard way:

So, for the girls and women of Oulu, the enrichment of racial and religious diversity has meant that they can’t walk alone at night and, if they are as young at 10, they risk being “groomed” and raped. But at least they’re safe during the day in a group, right?

Wrong. The 2018 grooming scandal was centered around a relatively new shopping mall in Oulu called Valkea. Somewhere to “hang around” in the biting Finnish winter, young “refugee” men idled there, as would Finnish teen and pre-teen girls who were too young to go to bars. The “refugees” groomed them by plying them with alcohol. But, now, the inevitable march of enrichment has captured a further citadel of civilized life: being safe in broad daylight.

On March 8, the tabloid IltaLehti ran this headline: A gang of 10 youths violently robbed minors in Oulu, the loot was a beanie—Police: “It’s going crazy” [10 hengen nuorisojoukko ryösti alaikäiset väkivaltaisesti Oulussa, saaliiksi pipo—Poliisi: ”Menee ihan hulluksi,” by Jussi Korhonen, March 8, 2023]. “Ten youths,” leftist code for young non-whites, attacked two Finns who were under 18 in the shopping center at 4 p.m. They tore the victims’ clothes and mildly injured them to steal a “beanie.”

It would be hilarious except that it's a process by which superior white cultures end up ultimately eliminated.

@HelloKeysii - Can Billy Crystal give you negroes some uncomfortable honesty in 2024?

Jerrod Carmichael hosted this year's Golden Globes. Jimmy Kimmel hosted the Oscars.

I see a bunch of you are giving me the Jennifer Lawrence "I don't quite get the difference between them" treatment. They're both movie awards shows. They both used to be watched by actual human beings (probably in your grandparents' time). Now they are watched by essentially nobody.

Carmichael had to, of course, take a break from the show (despite it not happening during Black History Month, talk about needing to stay in your lane better than your race does when I pass you on the Whitemud) to berate anybody who didn't endlessly celebrate him being a morally repugnant niggerfag.

“I’m here ‘cause I’m black,” quipped Carmichael. The pitfall of this joke is that if a renowned black comedian like Chris Rock were to say it, we would laugh at the ridiculous idea that his race scored him the opportunity. This time, however, we have reasonable suspicion that the HFPA invited a far less relevant comic to host in an attempt to save face.

“I won’t say they were a racist organization, but they didn’t have a single black member until George Floyd died,” Carmichael cynically remarked. He expressed surprise at being “invited to be the black face of an embattled white organization.” Although he won some cackles from champagne-drunk audience members, I doubt viewers at home were amused by Hollywood’s performative self-flagellation.

Yep, real "uncomfortable honesty" there. A European organization unsurprisingly is full of Europeans, and it's proof positive that they are a "racist organization" and not "your kind makes objectively shitty media".

Anyways going back to Kimmel, was he unapologetically white, brilliantly skewering blacks with awkward laughter and uncomfortable honesty? Er, nope, apparently not.

So next year can we have a proud straight white man come on and educate Miss Celie in a few things? I think the show would run a little long though...


@it_pinn - Feel free to stand in front of the bullet (I brought 2)

You can't "smear" a worthless shit stain.

That goes without saying, of course. The Shiny Pony is such a creature, if such a vaguely respectable term could be associated with such an evil man who has harmed more than any other Canadian in recent memory. 

Since the first day of Autumn, let's see what Shiny Pony has been up to:

  • On October 1st Canada became one of the last countries in the world to stop requiring healthy people be banned from entering just because they didn't unwittingly commit suicide. What new information did they have to undo this policy which had existing since July 2021? Exactly the same as they had to mandate the Pfizer Death Juice in the first place: none, and you're a traitor if you ask.
  • A week later the booster started to be pushed on 12-year-olds, despite the rest of the world already on a "whoa, these pathetic fake vaccines seem to be causing more harm than good just like conservatives contended from the get-go" trajectory. Why? Weren't you just listening?
  • The pathetically biased and neutered Emergency Act review began, and in what should be familiar territory the guy hired (clearly) had no special skills required other than a connection to the guy who the inquiry would be reasonably expected to throw in front of the firing squad. Throughout the inquiry we would repeatedly learn that Shiny Pony had no reason other than "they disagree with me" to deny fundamental human rights
  • Meanwhile, speaking of which, he implemented even further the LPC ban on handguns; the ownership of which is every single Canadian's ancient and unequivocal fundamental right
  • Wasted money on military equipment to kill niggers in Haiti
  • Wasted money on military equipment to kill Russian ANTIFA soldiers in Ukraine...then did it again two more weeks later
  • Selected a diversity hire squaw to the Supreme Court who's more interested in securing whitey money for her poorly behaving tribe than enforcing sensible laws
  • It was revealed that Shiny Pony had hired "psyops" officers to control Wuhan Flu narratives via the Canadian Armed Forces
  • Liberal cabinet minister and Muslim terrorist (but I repeat myself) Omar Alghabra, fresh off ignoring the summer airport crisis, decided to repeat the game with a winter airport crisis, and then decided a winter train station crisis was a great idea for a followup.
  • In an instant replay of the Laith Marouf incident from the summer, Jasmin Zine was given government funding by Shiny Pony's regime to basically accuse every high profile Jew of "islamophobia"
  • ArriveCan was being exposed as yet another LPC money laundering scheme, and one of PinnIt's compatriots decided to use her publicly funded role to attack critical journalists.
  • In what could be called EH-101: The Next Generation, the Canadian Armed Forces are going to be buying the same planes that they conceptually agreed to twenty years earlier and at great cost with no benefit to the domestic aerospace industry. Why not earlier? Because Shiny Pony wanted to show how much "better" he was than a predecessor who shouldn't have to even attend Rat Bastard 2.0's funeral
  • More tax money wasted on Ukrainian Nazis, including a $400M air defense system that has been on the Canadian military's wishlist for a decade. Maybe it's because they weren't racist enough?
  • As a warmup act for the next 60 days, 28/29 people's charges were dropped in a massive BC money laundering and political corruption investigation since one of the principal conspirators was a Chinaman connected to the PM's office
  • Remember that idiotic dental benefit that the NDP claimed would be an "investment"? The "most open and transparent government in history" said that the taxpayer isn't allowed to learn how much it will cost.
  • Another day, another hateful tirade from the guy who keeps telling us that "hatred" will be expunged from society on his watch.
  • Whoops, another key "advisor" to fight "Islamophobia" wrote numerous opinion columns blaming the Jews and the French for the world's problems
  • It turns out that PinnIt probably owns a hotel: they were paid $400k per lodger on "quarantining" people even after they relaxed the quarantine rules, and that's on top of $94M spent on hotels for illegal immigration scum who should have been shot before they crossed the border
  • More corruption exposed, this time with the McKinsey consulting firm (including them slush funneling tax money to an existing government employee)
  • Chinese interference in Canada? Not possible! Well, okay, except for those Chinese police stations that the RCMP to this day says they can't be bothered to shut down
  • Shiny Pony's cabinet minister Mary Ng caught in another money laundering scandal, and the CBC runs cover for her and for him (uh, look, anti-Asian racism!!!!!!)
  • Tried to take credit for military action which it turns out the Americans did without any input whatsoever
  • The Chinese corruption scandal started to make big gains. Read up and you'll see the PRC fingerprints over a lot of what we just covered: they funded Mary Ng, Michael Chan, and 9 others (8 of whose identities we have yet to confirm)
  • More Liberal grift and money laundering in the form of Brookfield Asset Management (based in Bermuda to avoid Canadian taxes and financial tracking obligations) getting federal grants for environmental initiatives they promise to start any day now
  • Former CBC chief is given a back-dated retroactive pay increase, one of a huge number of federal employees getting significant and generally off-the-books payments that don't show up in the annual budgets
  • Zijin Mining is a Chinese company that got special mining rights approved by the Shiny Pony himself...and oh look, one of his officials is tied to the Chinese election interference scandal!
  • After endlessly claiming that C-11 "won't go after user-generated content", Shiny Pony refuses to accept any of the Senate amendments to the bill which would reword the clauses which could be reasonably interpreted to include them
  • Han Dong is exposed as the 3rd of the 9 MPs who China installed under the Shiny Pony's government
  • Oh, and it turns out that Shiny Pony knew he was a foreign agent and campaigned for him anyways
  • A CSIS whistleblower who exposed the Chinese election interference to the Globe and Mail and Global TV News is targetted by Shiny Pony's best buddy to be identified and arrested for treason
  • Chinese election interferer Niu Gensheng gave the Trudeau Foundation a boatload of cash...because...she's nice, I guess. A plan for a Rat Bastard 1.0 and Chairman Mao statue was shelved for now (and no, that's not even a joke)
  • A detailed analysis of the 2015 election finds that a suspiciously large number of donations to the Shiny Pony's election campaign came from a Chinese neighbourhood in BC (despite the election taking place in Montreal)
  • In response to a proposed bill that would require tech companies to pay Canadian news orgs whose content they link to, tech companies agree to stop the practice. Turns out that doesn't funnel money to Shiny Pony's voter base and therefore is equally bad
  • It transpires that Kong Qingcun and Dong Hanpeng are two other Chinamen you need to remember the names of, since they bragged about how they funded and controlled Liberal MP Taleeb Noormohamed (who would be unaware Global News already knew about this and would publish a story within hours of his attack on "racist" Canadians falsely accusing China). He might be onto something, Liberal MP Anita Vandenbeld assured voters as a white woman she's immune from the Chinese interference...
  • At an event at a fire hall where members were forbidden from asking unapproved questions, Shiny Pony randomly blathered about flat earth theory before being gently nudged off the stage
  • Provisions in C-18 are implemented which would compel tech companies to disclose private communications retroactively going back a decade to identify anybody who has criticized the government
  • Finally, most recently, it turns out that Han Dong coordinated with China so that the "2 Michaels" would be released only after it became politically advantageous to the Shiny Pony

So which of these corrupt and evil actions are you willing to "fight for"? And are you willing to die for them? Because I'll take that trade.


"Family home in the Laurentians"

Joel Johannesen on how the Laurentian Elite is just toying with us now.

Other videos depict Johnston heaping praise on Chinese dictator Xi on some of his visits to China, and telling the Chinese that China is like “home” to him.

All in all, it’s not a great record for a guy who is supposedly “neutral” and unconflicted.

Nonetheless, it was first sold by Liberals and their media (but I repeat myself, yadda) as someone who must, surely, MUST be seen as perfectly impartial, because after all, and make no mistake this is The Only Important Thing, Conservative Stephen Harper appointed him as Gov-Gen! Ignore all those so-called “conflicts of interest facts” that are springing up like so many daffodils in spring! Harper y’all!

I’m leary. Maybe I’m cynical too. But I wonder what’s actually going on here. As I said, surely Trudeau knew this would come up even if he doesn’t know how Google works. Surely Johnston knew because he has 14 grandkids. Surely the Chinese, who know Johnston very well, knew. Surely the “news” media all knew because they spend half their day on Twitter getting the “news” from Liberal HQ, NDP HQ, and other lefty tweet sources. Are they really that secure in their positions? Are they now so emboldened and self-assured that Canada is now finally literally, firmly, under their thumbs and there ain’t a damn thing any of us stupids with “unacceptable views” on the right or in the center can do about it? Are they flipping us the bird and having a huge laugh along with Xi Jinping?


It's okay to be white (any other colour is up for some debate)

Greg Hood discusses why Scott Adams got in so much trouble for saying "Ethnic Group A should stay away from Ethnic Group Y if huge swathes of Group Y believe Group A shouldn't exist."

What has happened to Mr. Adams is why many whites are afraid to take their own side or even point out racial double standards. Whites do share some of the blame. However, it’s not just white “suicide.” An abused group may share some responsibility for collaborating with the abuser, but it is not entirely to blame.

White advocates could add that most people pushing segregated graduations are black. Most blacks think race is central to their identity. The whole point of critical race theory is to argue that even formally colorblind institutions are racist because they were built by white people. Most whites do not think race is central to their identity, but today, indifference to race (“colorblindness”) is another form of racism. If racism, ethnocentrism, or racial identity are problems, it’s not white people who suffer from them.

Whatever Scott Adams has said or will say in future, the situation is simple. He took many black activists at their word and said whites should no longer inflict their presence on blacks. That is apparently career-ending and proves that whites are in an impossible position. We can’t be around blacks without being inherently racist but we can’t leave either. We are expected to wallow in endless guilt. If we don’t, we suffer even more punishment, as Scott Adams has learned.

Hood tries to say however that Adams misunderstood the Rasmussen poll by pointing out that a strict mathematical majority of negores think whitey is okay.
Mr. Adams himself says he took the poll at face value.

If Rasmussen itself is too conservative-leaning or somehow not credible, that supports Mr. Adams’s argument. Rasmussen trumped its results as proof that “most voters reject anti-white beliefs.” If the poll had a goal, it was to prove the opposite of Mr. Adams’s point. It wanted to show that most Americans, including blacks, reject “wokeness.”

The best way to summarize Mr. Adams’s position may be that whites need to end a destructive relationship in which they are abused just for existing. If journalists and activists think it is hateful for whites to disengage, that exposes the central contradiction of American race relations. In the view of our rulers, whites and whiteness are harmful, but sparing blacks the agony of being around us is even worse. Whites can neither stay nor leave.

I'm not sure that this should be taken as small comfort. "Only" 46% of niggers think its okay that you be you. When even 1% of people don't think that trannies, who have complete control over who they are, should be 'okay' with being who they claim to be its some sort of murderous health crisis, but it being even money that any nigger you come across thinks that your own innate racial makeup is acceptable must surely present some sort of issue.

It's roughly parallel to how the Derka-Derkas feel about murdering in the name of their child molesting Satanic Prophet mohammed (worms be upon him as God damned him and his followers to burn in hell). Left-wing extremists like University of Ottawa's Stuart Chambers say "don't worry" about finding out that 10% of Muslims in your home country are okay with mass murder (and just don't ask what those numbers rise to when you ask them if they are indirectly okay with mass murder, or go from the general "is extremism wrong" to more specifics like "do you support the Tube Bombers actions and cause") even as your government vows to bring a million or more of them into the country annually.

46% is a shockingly large number. That means more than 1 out of every 20 Americans is a threat to white people. Seems more important of a story than a cartoonist making a rational suggestion based on that fact.


@smirkindirk41 - You're on a roll

Andy Ngo was attacked, and Dirk thought he'd pile it on.

He's hilarious, isn't he. And he wasn't done! When this woman was raped at a party earlier this year, she took to Twitter to painstakingly tell her story.

Which led, obviously, to this:

And they say comedy is dead.


@vexwerewolf - Project much?

I have bad news for Mr. Werewolf: I 100% agree with many (not all, obviously, part of being conservative is having critical thinking skills) of their "hot takes". Let's take a random Tim Pool comment from a couple weeks ago: as part of his ongoing feud with far-left Young Turks host Cenk Uygur, he showed a major news story to disprove Uygur's laughable claim that "equity" isn't something being supported by any even slightly mainstreamed leftists.

He could have picked any such example, really. Here, here's the Government of Canada using "equity of outcome" instead of "equality of opportunity" as the benchmark to whether the vagina/penis breakdown of Canada's Parliament is "good" or not. If that's not really your bag, how about the University of Minnesota?

Can Werewolf tell us why he thinks that Tim Pools "take" is wrong? Uyger claims that that only a dozen fringe activists across the USA use equal outcomes as their metric. It was literally child's play to prove him wrong. In fact, the only way he could have been so wrong was to be doing it deliberately. Ergo, he lied.

Come on, dude: show us the "intentionally bullshit" aspect of that take.

Okay so maybe he didn't mean to include Tim Pool, it was an original edit that he forget to wipe out. How about Steven Crowder? After all he's a bit of an easy punching bag these days after the infamous Daily Wire contract affair. Indeed you have to look back from before that event to find him talking about much else. 

Hey that's about the time some nigger dyke was released from Russian jail in return for the minor concession of letting an apparently decently talented arms dealer back out into the world where he could help Russia obtain more weaponry. What was Crowder's take? Oh, that it put people's lives at risk and was caused entirely by Grinder's drug dependency.

Hey wait, aren't they supposed to be all bad takes? What's "bad" about this take? Britney Grinder was only in Russian jail because she had an illegal substance on her person within their borders: normal people know full well that you can't landing in Singapore with pot, or try to smuggle some cocaine into Saudi Arabia, or even try to buy heroin in Vietnam. It's a bloody travel advisory given by governments of almost all countries.

It looks like Gary Werewolf up here is talking some complete bullshit. An intentionally bad take, one might say. He's so politically insulated from superior conservatives in his day-to-day life that he cannot even fathom somebody might support what they say, and even (as we've just done) take minimal effort in proving the validity of what they say. You can make his opinion completely worthless just by uttering the phrase "actually I agree with what Shapiro said there". He has no counter-argument to such a statement.

Does he know this? Is he deliberately making such a statement knowing its "intentional bullshit" just to get people talking about him (in, perhaps, famous Canadian blogs)? Or is he just as dumb as all leftists and unaware that four of his fingers are pointing back at him (and the other one just hanging there limp)?


The gospel according to Saint Patrick

It's almost bar time on St. Patrick's Day. While people who don't have to work will be lining up at O'Byrnes at 10am, for the rest of us the festivities are a few hours away.

It will hopefully be the first normal St. Patrick's Day since 2019. We all know what happened in 2020. In 2021 was obviously more of the same, and while 2022 came close (thanks Truckers!) people were still in general scared of their own shadows.

It's also Friday St. Patrick's Day which should be fun. And with next year's falling on a Saturday it should...wait, what?


That's right, 2024 is a leap year and therefore the days which normally advance by one day per year (7*52=364) advances by two. Which means March 17th 2024 will fall on a Sunday and we will be deprived of the sweetness which is a Saturday St. Patrick's.

We have to wait until 2029 until we finally get to party on a Saturday: start at 10am at O'Byrnes and then finish at 2am at...well, also O'Byrnes. The same O'Byrnes that it will be literally impossible to get into anytime after 4pm today.

Bonus coverage: Isn't it funny that the Irish nationalists who were so horrified that their fellow Irishmen wanted to remain in Britain to the extent they turned murderous now just shrug when Africa conquers their isle in nothing flat?


@Amanda_Sather - Please provide a list of which vandalism in support of conservative causes you endorse

"X is bad, so if Y is less bad than you should be allowed to do Y" is the logical leaps that delusional believers in global warming engage in. Mr. Sather is only the latest to be guilty of it.

As is typical of eco-nutters, the actual facts on the ground don't line up with their beliefs. Alan appears to be in his mid-30s, which means for his entire adult life he hasn't witnessed any manmade global warming. Let's put that aside for now though, and let's assume that Mr. Sather's garbage beliefs at all align with the facts. Let's actually say that X is bad, and then let's also presume that petty vandalism (Y) isn't particularly bad.

With Sather allow conservatives the exact same path forward? For example, say a gun rights advocate (worried that hateful government policies will literally "erase" us) decided to protest a proposed hunting ban by vandalizing this BC mural devoted to dogs?

How about if paint is used on an office building to protest a nearby library letting faggots in dresses read to little kids? Because of course putting some paint onto something that's easily removed is as bad as not caring about child molesters recruiting kids into their evil lifestyle.

That's how this works, right? It's not just something you're excusing specifically because you (stupidly) believe in the same cause as the mammoth protesters, is it?

Edmonton police officers shot and killed

Early this morning, two Edmonton police officers were shot and killed over by Westmount.

Obviously details are sketchy, and more will be learned in the forthcoming hours/days/months. Early reports are that it was a domestic call.

The only thing of note is already the mainstream media can't mention the story without referencing the last EPS officer shot and killed. Before it gets too much traction, remember that Daniel Woodall was an evil faggot who was pushing the radical sodomite agenda when he died, and we should never feel bad about his righteous punishment.


This day in (blog) history

Edmonton hosted the Red Bull "crushed ice" event and inexplicably set the temperature record.


@rollforlearning - The best people in your schools aren't represented and instead you are disgustingly shaming them

Evil dyke (but I'm repeating myself) Shawna is very concerned that children whose parents are swingers aren't going to be "fairly represented" in schools, unless their textbooks and other resources reference (positively, of course) their perverted lifestyle.

As you might have guessed, endorsing an unacceptable perversion is certainly on-brand for Shawna and her ilk. Thinking that these nutters "deserve" representation is equally predictable, even though it's wrong. While she certainly seems interested in teaching kids about swingers (even swinger parents tend not to tell their children until they become adults, in much the same way and for much the same reason they never tell their children about being slum landlords or car thieves),she isn't giving much reason of why she has to. Clearly she's incapable of actual "good faith" engaging, but if she were she should be required to answer this question:

You have kids with socially conservative families in our schools, so how are you representing them with your books and practices?

Unlike uranists and trannies and swingers,we actually have a solid moral and intellectual foundation to our lifestyle. I guarantee that Shawna's "equity library" doesn't have anything by Ted Byfield or Rod Dreher or Jonathon Van Maren.

So why don't the children with the highest calibre of family get their representation? Why is Shawna only promoting illegitimate lifestyle choices?

Oh, right: self-preservation.


The Civil War saw brother face off against brutha

Over at The Atlantic (try not to be shocked), nigger activist Clint Smith has a ridiculous article about how Confederate gravesites aren't black enough, or something.

Outside, lawn mowers buzzed as Black men steered them between tombstones draped in Confederate flags. The oldest marked grave at Blandford dates back to 1702; new funerals are held there every week. Within the cemetery’s 150 acres are the bodies of roughly 30,000 Confederate soldiers, one of the largest mass graves of Confederate servicemen in the country.

These were real men with real lives and real loved ones who died in a bloody war. All wars involve a victor and a vanquished, the the victor goes on to sing about how great a job he did. Smith apparently wants to dance and flail and cheer over their graves, which to be fair is totally what a primitive nigger mentally (if not genealogically) half a foot still in Africa would do.

“I think there’s a Confederate empathy,” he replied. “People will tell you, ‘My great-great-grandmother, my great-great-grandfather are buried out here.’ So they’ve got long southern roots.”

We left the church, and a breeze slid across my face. Many people go to places like Blandford to see a piece of history, but history is not what is reflected in that glass. A few years ago, I decided to travel around America visiting sites that are grappling—or refusing to grapple—with America’s history of slavery. I went to plantations, prisons, cemeteries, museums, memorials, houses, and historical landmarks. As I traveled, I was moved by the people who have committed their lives to telling the story of slavery in all its fullness and humanity. And I was struck by the many people I met who believe a version of history that rests on well-documented falsehoods.

What's wrong with refusing to grapple? After all, as we've covered before, slavery is not some unique thing that white Americans did to blacks. Slavery was a thing the world over where a superior conquering nation took the people from the inferior conquered nation and put them to work. I'm truly sorry to whiners like Clint Smith that his ancestors were so inferior that they became history's punching bag, but I'm not sure what he expected to happen? 10,000 years of human history thrown away the moment slavers got to Africa and thought golly gee, now that they're all the same skin colour as the mud I scrape off my boot when I get bored this just isn't fun anymore?

Also, and this really can't be said enough, for a magazine that insists that niggers are shot by the cops too often or that Ellen Page is a man named Elliot, get off your high horse about "well-documented falsehoods" since your entire trade is in them.

I asked her whether Blandford was concerned that, by presenting itself in such a positive light, it might be distorting its connection to a racist and treasonous cause.

Niggers really like latching onto this "treason" thing about the War Between the States (and they really should try looking in a mirror). Of course, one of the...what's the word....well-documented thing about the Reconstruction Era is that literally nobody considered the Confederate cause to be "treason". Robert E. Lee wasn't included in President Jackson's original pardon but that later turned out to be a mistake (which took way too long to be officially resolved). Union General Josh Chamberlain ordered his troops to salute the surrendering Confederate soldiers, while President Lincoln had the band on the White House lawn play "Dixie". This "going against the policy of the United States Government is treasonous" (which again, BLM niggers love to ignore when it suits them) attitude towards the Civil War literally didn't exist before 9/11. It flies directly in the face, of course, about how the left currently treats sanctuary cities treasonously avoiding ICE (which northern states also did in the years prior to the Civil War regarding fugitive slaves in violation of federal law). It's also, unsurprisingly, incongruous to how other civil wars have been perceived. Which was the "right" side of the Spanish Civil War, for example? War of the Roses? English Civil War? Great Feudal War?

What Clint Smith wants to downplay the U.S. Civil War into is a rebellion by the Confederacy, akin to the Boxer or Northwest versions in Chinanada. Now who's trafficking in falsehoods?

She told me that a lot of people ask why the war was fought. “I say, ‘Well, you get five different historians who have written five different books; I’m going to have five different answers.’ It’s a lot of stuff. But I think from the perspective of my ancestors, it was not slavery. My ancestors were not slaveholders. But my great-great-grandfather fought. He had federal troops coming into Norfolk. He said, ‘Nuh-uh, I’ve got to join the army and defend my home state.’ ”

That an Atlantic writer, who claims to be an insightful expert into nuance and then is totally oblivious to it, fails to note that there can be more than one right answer, shouldn't surprise us. Like all woke leftists, Clint Smith exists to lie and deceive to promote his inferior agenda...by definition, it's the only avenue available to him. As many have noted before, of course, the prevailing attitude in the southern States regarding what legislation should be applicable regarding slavery was that it was up to the citizens of those states to decide. This wasn't exactly an "unheard of" or "treasonous" thought, which Nigger Smith would like you to believe: darling northern intellectuals long before the Civil War (including Henry Adams and Carl Schurz) shared in that belief. The idea that northern and southern states should be allowed to set their own pro- or anti-slavery policies was universal on each side of the Mason-Dixon line and in fact the largest group advocating for a war to change that status were northern abolitionists. On the flip side, of course, the shots fired at Fort Sumner was caused by the belief that a federal jurisdiction in newly-independent land was still federal jurisdiction: and that rather tenuous system (imagine Alberta or Queerbec being told all federal government buildings would remain in Canadian hands no matter what they did; or for that matter all Sudanese buildings in South Sudan or Imperial British buildings in Ireland) was highly unlikely to be the basis for northerners deciding to join the conflict.

That linked CityJournal article is a good read, including a throwaway line digging at social justice liars operating out of the law school of the University of Missouri–Kansas City. Readers who recognize that college's name should pat themselves on the back.

So he shouldn't be surprised that a large number of southerners, whether sympathetic or opposed to slavery, took issue during the Civil War based on the principle of states' rights: they were acting lock-step in favour of men like Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Parker. Lincoln, by the way, had different reasons for fighting the Civil War than several of his compatriots: is this level of nuance more than Clint Smith's tiny brain can handle? The answer is yes. So in his view everybody fighting the U.S. Civil War joined over the exact same wedge issue. He just has to ignore...you know...the actual history.

The great Confederate general Robert E. Lee opposed slavery and freed his slaves. Lee fought on the Confederate side because Virginia was his home and he thought Virginia had the right to be wrong. Lee was an honorable man as well as a great general. His men followed him, many of them hungry and barefoot, because of his personal qualities and because they lived in the South - not because they held a brief for slavery. Shelby Foote describes perplexed Union soldiers asking a captured Confederate, poor and shoeless, why he was fighting when he clearly didn't own any slaves. The soldier answered, "Because you're down here."

The North had a variety of reasons for what they did before during and after the Civil War, and so did the South. With the advantage of the lens of history you can see all of them and how they did and did not align. But not Clint Smith. He thinks just whining "racism" 40,000 times is an answer to anything.

I walked across the street, to another burial ground, this one much smaller. The People’s Memorial Cemetery was founded in 1840 by 28 members of Petersburg’s free Black community. Buried on this land are people who were enslaved; a prominent antislavery writer; Black veterans of the Civil War, World War I, and World War II; and hundreds of other Black residents.

There are far fewer tombstones than at Blandford. There are no flags on the graves. And there are no hourly tours for people to remember the dead.

It sounds like the niggers of Petersburg VA aren't as interested in the affairs of their ancestors as whites are (perhaps knowing your father's identity helps). They don't run good tours, or like to go on tours, or care, or have moved on or moved away. Much like the fighting in the Civil War itself there are probably good (or at least for them understandable) reasons for how this other gravesite is treated: Clint Smith isn't interested in understanding them though: that his own race is ignoring its own gravesite seems enough for his en passant sneer at Virginians honouring their own ancestors who tragically died way too early in The War Between the States.

Founded in 1896, the Sons of Confederate Veterans describes itself as an organization of about 30,000 that aims to preserve “the history and legacy of these heroes, so future generations can understand the motives that animated the Southern Cause.” It is the oldest hereditary organization for men who are descendants of Confederate soldiers. I was wary of going to the celebration alone, so I asked my friend William, who is white, to come with me.

I call bullshit that there's any white so down on his luck that he has to befriend somebody as useless as Smith. Or is this a "I can't be your typical Atlantic black racist, I even have a white friend" cover story?

The entrance to the cemetery was marked by a large stone archway with the words our confederate heroes on it. Maybe a couple hundred people were sitting in folding chairs around a large white gazebo. Children played tag among the trees; people hugged and slapped one another on the back. I felt like I was walking in on someone else’s family reunion. Dixie flags bloomed from the soil like milkweeds. There were baseball caps emblazoned with the Confederate battle flag, biker vests ornamented with the seals of seceding states, and lawn chairs bearing the letters UDC, for the United Daughters of the Confederacy. In front of the gazebo were two flags, one Confederate, one American, standing side by side, as if 700,000 people hadn’t been killed in the epic conflagration between them.

For one thing, neither of the two flags Smith looked at were fighting each other. The Civil War was between entities with these two flags:

For another, despite the occasional Yankee carpetbagger the whole point of the Reconstruction South was...what's the word?...oh yes, reconstruction. Being upset at the Confederate Battle Flag being flown alongside the 1950s United States Flag would be like anger over the British and French flags being flown alongside, or the Russian and German flags. The whole point is that the two sides are supposed to be able to live together in harmony: that's again one of the reason so many Confederates were memorialized in bronze a hundred years ago.

The crowd recited the Pledge of Allegiance, then sang “The Star-Spangled Banner.” After a pause came “Dixie,” the unofficial Confederate anthem. The crowd sang along with a boisterous passion: “Oh, I wish I was in the land of cotton / Old times there are not forgotten / Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.”

As we just noted, Abraham Lincoln ordered the playing of "Dixie" immediately after the Civil War ended and arranged for numerous other playings.

Gramling then turned his attention to the present-day controversy about Confederate monuments—to the people who are “trying to take away our symbols.” In 2019, according to a report from the Southern Poverty Law Center, there were nearly 2,000 Confederate monuments, place names, and other symbols in public spaces across the country. A follow-up report after last summer’s racial-justice protests found that more than 160 of those symbols had been removed or renamed in 2020.

Gramling said that this was the work of “the American ISIS.” He looked delighted as the crowd murmured its affirmation. “They are nothing better than ISIS in the Middle East. They are trying to destroy history they don’t like.”

I thought about friends of mine who have spent years fighting to have Confederate monuments removed. Many of them are teachers committed to showing their students that we don’t have to accept the status quo. Others are parents who don’t want their kids to grow up in a world where enslavers loom on pedestals. And many are veterans of the civil-rights movement who laid their bodies on the line, fighting against what these statues represented. None of them, I thought as I looked at the smile on Gramling’s face, is a terrorist.

How many of Nigger Smith's friends who demand statues be ripped down were physically ripping them down (and maybe grabbing some nice electronics while in the neighbourhood) do you think? If discussing what a gender mutilation clinic posted on their Facebook page is "terrorism" then what on earth do violent niggers using fire to destroy monuments to people superior to them qualify as?

Gramling urged all who were present to understand the true meaning of the Confederacy and to “take back the narrative.” When his speech ended, two men in front of William and me started swinging large Confederate flags with unsettling fervor. Another speech was given. Another song was sung. Wreaths were laid. The honor guard then lifted its rifles and fired into the sky three times. The first shot took me by surprise, and my knees buckled. I shut my eyes for the second shot, and again for the third. I felt a tightening of muscles inside my mouth, muscles I hadn’t known were there.

We found the one nigger in America who's scared of guns (I mean in general, not in the more specific sense of the business end of the homeowner's gun whose living room he found himself in at 2am)!

It was then, in the late 1800s, that the myth of the Lost Cause began to take hold. The myth was an attempt to recast the Confederacy as something predicated on family and heritage rather than what it was: a traitorous effort to extend the bondage of millions of Black people. The myth asserts that the Civil War was fought by honorable men protecting their communities, and not about slavery at all.

Clint Smith really is that retarded.

I know you think it must be a prank and that you'll look more closely at the URL and discover that it's actually some sort of fake page, but here we are. As noted above, there can be multiple reasons for the exact same action.

None of them are "traitorous" of course, we've covered that ground too. He seems to think it's some sort of gotcha that indeed he can find people who got their bees in a bonnet in 1883 specifically to keep black slaves. Yet on the floor of a legislative body to this very day you can not only hear multiple arguments in favour of legislation, but in fact hear arguments in favour of legislation that politicians are making in bad faith. The NDP, whose leader is an anti-Indian terrorist, claims that he and his party are standing up for the poor beleaguered citizens of Kashmir when in reality this is just Jazz Meat demanding that the criminal organizations he supports be given free reign in their campaign of terror.

How many northerners who pushed for the Civil War were really that keen on letting niggers in another part of the country go free? While there certainly were abolitionist movements (it was unheard of in the 1st through 18th centuries, a popular thing in the 19th century, and basically nonexistent by a quarter through the 20th -- which is why Clint Smith's pointless virtue signalling opposing the notion of slavery in the 21st is so laughable) it wasn't the only reason for the North to fight the South. After all, there was slavery in several other countries at that time and Washington and New York weren't sending men to go die in them.

Indeed Abraham Lincoln didn't intend to end slavery in the South had the war been won more quickly. He wasn't alone:

Explaining Northern purposes continues to vex historians, in part because Northerners gave varied answers to the question. Most Northerners saw preserving the Union as the war’s central purpose, and proved willing to take measures against slavery in order to achieve that aim. But some Northerners sought to restore the Union to the antebellum status quo, and others sought to thoroughly transform the South into a free labor, egalitarian society. Did Northerners possess a common aim, and language for expressing it?

That the Civil War wasn't "slavery bad people fighting slavery good people" is partly why Reconstruction was so successful and why the South didn't turn into a guerilla quadmire.

In his biography of Grant, Ron Chernow says the Union general believed that “had Lee resisted surrender and encouraged his army to wage guerrilla warfare, it would have spawned infinite trouble. ... Such was Lee’s unrivaled stature that his acceptance of defeat reconciled many diehard rebels to follow his example.”

Thanks to Lee, we became a functioning country again within about 15 years, instead of becoming Serbia, Afghanistan, Korea, Vietnam, Rwanda and on and on and on.

It's only our own ignorant times, led by the ignorant leftsts who morphed Clint Smith into the dumb nigger he is today, that altered that social construct.

The early 1900s saw a boom in Confederate-monument building. The monuments were meant to reinforce white supremacy in an era when Black communities were being terrorized and Black social and political mobility impeded.
See? The entire (successful) aims of Reconstruction are spat on by this pathetic excuse for a human being. I'm not going to take lectures from men who are stupid enough to think "white supremacy" influences any institutes of officialdom in the third decade of the twenty-first century.
After the speeches, I began talking with a man named Jeff, who had a long salt-and-pepper ponytail and wore a denim vest adorned with Confederate badges. He told me that several of his ancestors had fought for the Confederacy. I asked what he thought of the event. “Well,” he said, “I think if anyone never knew the truth, they heard it today.”

He spoke about the importance of the Confederate flag and monuments, contending that they were essential pieces of history. “They need to be there for generations in the future, because they need to know the truth. They can’t learn the truth if you do away with history. You’ll never learn. And once you do away with that type of thing, you become a slave.”

I was startled by his choice of words but couldn’t tell whether it was intentionally provocative or rhetorical coincidence.

I'd like to think Jeff was rubbing it in your face (it's easy and fun to do) but he probably didn't care about you that much. Or he could just be trying to get niggers to stop thinking everything that has to do with slavery involves you. Even in the Continental United States that's a ridiculously narrow minded notion. Spending more than 16 seconds listening to people smarter than Ta-Nehisi Coates (which shouldn't take you more than 14 seconds to find) would teach you a lesson or two about that. You don't even have to listen to anybody but another American black!
I asked Jeff whether he thought slavery had played a role in the start of the Civil War. “Oh, just a very small part. I mean, we can’t deny it was there. We know slave blocks existed.” But only a small number of plantations even had slaves, he said.

It was a remarkable contortion of history, reflecting a century of Lost Cause propaganda.

And yet the vast majority of Southern farmers were Yeomen with no slaves. Jeff is probably confusing plantation with farm, but again Smith makes it seem like Jeff is unaware that his direct ancestors enslaved 63 billion people from 1619 to the day before yesterday.

Two children ran behind me, chasing a ball. Jeff smiled. He told me that he doesn’t call it the “Civil War,” because that distorts the truth. “We call it the ‘War Between the States’ or ‘of Northern Aggression’ against us,” he said. “Southern people don’t call it the Civil War, because they know it was an invasion … If you stayed up north, ain’t nothing would’ve happened.”

When Jeff said “nothing would’ve happened,” I wondered if he had forgotten the millions of Black people who would have remained enslaved, those for whom the status quo would have meant ongoing bondage. Or did he remember but not care?

Why should Jeff care? If the South had won the Civil War slavery would probably have ended up being abolished around the same time the Ottomans abolished it. Indeed regular readers will remember that whites had to stop niggers from enslaving each other when Britain took over Sierra Leone in 1928, so if you want a generally end-of-the-line date slavery would have ended that's a good bet (though Saudi Arabia held on until The Beatles). Slavery could have been ended in the Middle East decades earlier by letting the Kaiser just go do his thing, even earlier if the British hadn't intervened in the Russo-Turkish War. What's Clint Smith's opinion of the Treaty of San Stefano? Doesn't he care that all those innocent slaves (and Slavs) in the Ottoman Empire suffered ongoing status quo bondage?

He doesn't, of course, and like Jeff not caring about the fate of plantation workers in Georgia a century before his birth we don't need to get worked up about it. I'm sure there are a lot of Bulgarian Jews less than thrilled about the outcome of the Russo-Turkish War and would much prefer that the slave-holding Ottomans kicked the slave-liberating Russians ass six ways from Sunday.

“We used to be able to stand on the monuments on Monument Avenue [in Richmond, Virginia]—those Lee and Jackson monuments. We can’t do it anymore, ’cause it ain’t safe. Someone’s gonna drive by and shoot me. You know, that’s what I’m afraid of.”

I thought that scenario was unlikely; cities have spent millions of dollars on police protection for white nationalists and neo-Nazis, people far more extreme than the Sons of Confederate Veterans. I found it a little ironic that these monuments had been erected in part to instill fear in Black communities, and now Jason was the one who felt scared.

Clint was today years old when he learned that nigger savagery is a concern to decent ordinary folk. And yes, the state has to spend money when niggers get violent. Why, Clint never thinks to ask, do the people he slanders as "white nationalists and neo-Nazis" cost the state so much to protect? Why, it's because scumbags like him hear (superior) arguments they can't counter and just get uppity, violently attacking marchers and property and causing millions in damage. Why does Jason have to worry? Ask the good people in Charlottesville who were injured and their property destroyed by Antifa.

The Louisville Daily Courier, for example, warned nonslaveholding white southerners about the slippery slope of abolition: “Do they wish to send their children to schools in which the negro children of the vicinity are taught? Do they wish to give the negro the right to appear in the witness box to testify against them?” The paper threatened that Black men would sleep with white women and “amalgamate together the two races in violation of God’s will.”

Wow, look at how unhinged and crazy these people were...they were wrong about the nigger in the witness box though, they still are only to be found in the defendant's chair.

A small courtyard called the Field of Angels memorializes the 2,200 enslaved children who died in St. John the Baptist Parish from 1823 to 1863. Their names are carved into granite slabs that encircle the space. My tour guide, Yvonne, the site’s director of operations, explained that most had died of malnutrition or disease. Yvonne, who is Black, added that there were stories of some enslaved mothers killing their own babies, rather than sentencing them to a life of slavery.

You can take the abortions away from the negress but you can't take the negress away from abortions, can you?

Did the white visitors, I asked her, experience the space differently from the Black visitors? She told me that the most common question she gets from white visitors is “I know slavery was bad … I don’t mean it this way, but … Were there any good slave owners?”

She took a deep breath, her frustration visible. She had the look of someone professionally committed to patience but personally exhausted by the toll it takes.

“I really give a short but nuanced answer to that,” she said. “Regardless of how these individuals fed the people that they owned, regardless of how they clothed them, regardless of if they never laid a hand on them, they were still sanctioning the system … You can’t say, ‘Hey, this person kidnapped your child, but they fed them well. They were a good person.’ How absurd does that sound?”

According to Clint and Yvonne, the entirety of human history before 1820 was full of evil people sanctioning an evil system. What a pathetic and horrible way to live your life. No wonder your own people continue to get such a thrill of enslaving you.

Would Jeff’s story change, I wonder, if he went to the Whitney? Would his sense of what slavery was, and what his ancestors fought for, survive his coming face-to-face with the Whitney’s murdered rebels and lost children? Would he still be proud?

Let's hope so.


@JournalismTMU - This is why you only hire straight white men

To paraphrase Kate McMillan, the best argument in favour of only hiring straight white males is that then it's never a big deal if you subsequently have to fire them.

In this particular case, apparently media companies have to devote extra resources when they hire nonwhite women who would utterly fail without them: for those keeping score, that's objectively confirming that they are in fact inferior.

Every newsroom who hires a negress has a hiring manager who has utterly failed at his job. (Case in point: the ridiculous bro-haha over Lisa LaFlamme)

Related: a worthless cunt has been fired right after winning a fake award for "adversity" she never actually faced.

Everything Michael Knowles said about trans-testicles is 100.00% true

If anything, he doesn't go far enough by only talking about trannies and not the evil faggot agenda it has been running parallel to.


This day in (blog) history


Hey remind me again, does anybody care about Hilary Clinton's emails?


@mocndu - Pretending to know what somebody looks like naked is "sexual harassment" while advocating for physical rape is a-okay?

This is seriously how demented some people are. When @thisisop raised an issue with Maya Higa comparing deepfakes with the time she regrets sleeping with a guy at a party, stinky here denounced him as an "incel". (see our extended coverage of this issue here)

As we've established, everybody who calls a man an incel is telling him he should rape a woman and he'll be a better person.

Only one side needs to shut up forever, stoink, and you see them every time you pass a mirror.


@NewlunJen - Don't all plays involve "lying"?

Trigger warnings were a parody of themselves about 15 seconds after they came along.

This newest (well, 4 months old) case is a play at Princeton which looks absolutely horrible despite their best claims to make it sound like it has nuggets of interest.

Self-harm through burning is discussed during the scene where Portia and Quincy are on the stage left balcony (Act II), the scene after Quincy and Vincent talk to the Administration (Act II), and On The Other Side of Failure (Act II, cue: Quincy enters holding a broom).
Internalized homophobia is discussed in the scene where Ambrose and Vincent talk in the gym (Act I, cue: Ambrose leaves the Marmorei in the gym), throughout I Love You, I Swear, and depicted in the scene before I Love You, I Swear
Stalking is discussed in the scene after Quincy sees the saints for the first time (Act I, cue: Saint Jude leaves), and depicted in the scene transitions at the end of Where Can I Run
However, the big bit that caught Christina Sommers attention (and apparently the enthusiastic support of Jen) was this bit:
Lying/manipulation is discussed in The One Who Pulls The Strings (Act I, cue: Portia tries to leave the newsroom), the scene where Beatrix is interviewed by Portia (Act II, cue: Beatrix and Portia bring out the interview chairs), the scene after Where Can I Run reprise (Act II, cue: Quincy storms off with the saints) and the final scene (Act II, cue: the pyre is wheeled in by the Marmorei), and depicted in the scene where Vincent and Beatrix are in the newspaper archives

The first thing you think of is how weak and pathetic these poor students are that they are troubled by a fictional depiction of lying.

The second thing, which really destroys it all, is a reminder that the play is 100% lying, as almost all plays are. For example, at some point on stage you're going to see a woman named Lana Gaige: the problem is at no point during the event does she accurately state her name as Lana...instead she acts (pretends/lies) as if her name was really "Ambrose", while another person on stage named Tobias Nguyen falsely says his name is "Vincent" and constantly refers to Lana by the false name "Ambrose". Indeed the entire conversation isn't true: they are claiming events and feelings which they haven't experienced or felt. Almost like, and try to follow along carefully with me on this, as a fictional work everything discussed is a lie.

There are no real people named Quincy, Vincent, Beatrix, nor Portia. It's all a lie: one wonders if other plays without "lying/deception" being triggered would cause these poor darlings' minds to blow open.


@ArtificiallyGi1 - Parents have one key advantage over "professionals"

Nowadays you're hearing a lot about how the medical and education professions have decided that they must seize children (if not physically, at least ideologically) from their parents.

One of the problems, which GiGi apparently hasn't grasped, is that these "professionals" who train and learn for years spend it learning, and then teaching, the lies of the faggot agenda. As "awareness" and "resources" continue to expand regarding mental health, it's curious that nobody notices the key metrics that these professionals claim to be trying to prevent keep rising.

The way parents keep their child's trust is by always speaking out against this evil lifestyle choice: not by letting credentialed morons take the reigns.


@FleaBetty - Which principled conservative did you vote for as CPC leader?

Betty isn't a fan of Pierre Poilievre (and not for the reasons she should be). She insists the party needs a new leader.

Why? What's her rationale? During the CPC leadership race we saw a lot of candidates and a lot of ink (not on this blog for reasons I may get into one day) be spilled. The top contenders were, of course:

  1. Pierre Poilievre
  2. Jean Charest
  3. Leslyn Lewis
  4. Roman Baber
  5. Scott Aitchison

Other candidates who dropped out earlier include Patrick Brown, Bobby Singh,Marc Dalton,Leona Alleslev, Joel Etienne, and Grant Abraham. The other big name who didn't even apply this time was Derek Sloan who ran for leader in 2020.

Which one did Betty support? She didn't seem to like Roman Baber and never once mentioned Leslyn Lewis or Scott Aitchison. So Charest then? But the only time she even mentioned Charest was to attack Poilievre.

Maybe she was still loyal to the old guard. Erin O'Toole was the previous leader and no wait she doesn't like him either. Andrew Scheer? No, apparently all he does is "bad mouth the Prime Minister". The Right Honourable Stephen J. Harper (pbuh)? He apparently "sold the country to the Chinese".

I think by now you see the point: Betty is a liar. Her opposition to Pierre Poilievre will only last until the "cons choose a new leader" at which point she'll instantly pivot to disliking them. I mean on one level that's fine, that's politics. However, she's trying to make it sound as if she's demanding the Conservatives pick a new leader to win her vote back, when there's nothing they can do short of educating her in how retarded her beliefs are.

For somebody upset that Scheer "badmouths the PM" she sure badmouthed every notable Conservative in the country. For somebody worried about "selling the country to the Chinese" she sure supports the leader who is corruptly in bed with Communist China and colluded with them to keep the Conservatives out of power. Armed with this sort of information, the best thing to happen is for Pierre to face off with her in real life.

And then when she runs and disappears forever in shame vowing never to tweet or even vote again, we can move onto the next retarded leftist, and over and over and over again.

It's easier at this point to keep a leader and remove the bad aspects of the electorate (though Prime Minister Derek Sloan has a great ring to it).