My opinion on Tim Pool is the same as it is on Ben Shapiro, Steven Crowder and the rest of the right-wing shitrat grift network: they know their takes are bad. Their takes are intentionally bullshit and they spread them specifically so that people will talk about them.
— VƎX Werewolf #OpenDnD (@vexwerewolf) October 19, 2021
Don't.
I have bad news for Mr. Werewolf: I 100% agree with many (not all, obviously, part of being conservative is having critical thinking skills) of their "hot takes". Let's take a random Tim Pool comment from a couple weeks ago: as part of his ongoing feud with far-left Young Turks host Cenk Uygur, he showed a major news story to disprove Uygur's laughable claim that "equity" isn't something being supported by any even slightly mainstreamed leftists.
He could have picked any such example, really. Here, here's the Government of Canada using "equity of outcome" instead of "equality of opportunity" as the benchmark to whether the vagina/penis breakdown of Canada's Parliament is "good" or not. If that's not really your bag, how about the University of Minnesota?
Can Werewolf tell us why he thinks that Tim Pools "take" is wrong? Uyger claims that that only a dozen fringe activists across the USA use equal outcomes as their metric. It was literally child's play to prove him wrong. In fact, the only way he could have been so wrong was to be doing it deliberately. Ergo, he lied.
Come on, dude: show us the "intentionally bullshit" aspect of that take.
Okay so maybe he didn't mean to include Tim Pool, it was an original edit that he forget to wipe out. How about Steven Crowder? After all he's a bit of an easy punching bag these days after the infamous Daily Wire contract affair. Indeed you have to look back from before that event to find him talking about much else.
Hey that's about the time some nigger dyke was released from Russian jail in return for the minor concession of letting an apparently decently talented arms dealer back out into the world where he could help Russia obtain more weaponry. What was Crowder's take? Oh, that it put people's lives at risk and was caused entirely by Grinder's drug dependency.
Hey wait, aren't they supposed to be all bad takes? What's "bad" about this take? Britney Grinder was only in Russian jail because she had an illegal substance on her person within their borders: normal people know full well that you can't landing in Singapore with pot, or try to smuggle some cocaine into Saudi Arabia, or even try to buy heroin in Vietnam. It's a bloody travel advisory given by governments of almost all countries.
It looks like Gary Werewolf up here is talking some complete bullshit. An intentionally bad take, one might say. He's so politically insulated from superior conservatives in his day-to-day life that he cannot even fathom somebody might support what they say, and even (as we've just done) take minimal effort in proving the validity of what they say. You can make his opinion completely worthless just by uttering the phrase "actually I agree with what Shapiro said there". He has no counter-argument to such a statement.
Does he know this? Is he deliberately making such a statement knowing its "intentional bullshit" just to get people talking about him (in, perhaps, famous Canadian blogs)? Or is he just as dumb as all leftists and unaware that four of his fingers are pointing back at him (and the other one just hanging there limp)?
