I'm not implying that this article about the risk of catching the Cantonese Cough based on age and vaccination status is itself misinformation. That term describes 99% of what the NYT actually publishes, but the key takeaway is this:
If two weeks earlier you had put up a YouTube video saying this exact same thing (maybe you are a time traveler and decided to simply read a future NYT article), the morning that the New York Times published this story your YouTube video would have already been removed for promoting misinformation.
Related: YouTube has punished Rebel Media for telling the truth against the Official Lie.
