Over in Prince Edward Island, somebody dared to point out that all of the lies about Residential Schools have yet to show any evidence whatsoever.
The CBC, as you might guess, is mad as all hell:
A councillor in the village of Murray Harbour, P.E.I., is being asked to step down after a sign on his property carried a message offensive to residential school survivors and other members of the Indigenous community.
The wording has now been removed from the sign, located on property owned by Murray Harbour Coun. John Robertson.
Photos taken before the message was taken down show that it called the detection of unmarked graves at the former sites of residential schools in the last few years a "hoax" referring to them as "mass graves." It added: "Redeem Sir John A's integrity."
Referring to them as "mass graves" is a horrible thing, isn't it CBC? As you might guess, the retard who wrote the article () isn't aware of who else had referred to the soil disturbances in Kamloops as "mass graves". Say, for a random example, the New York Times, or hey how about the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation itself?
A previous version of this story referred to "mass graves" and this has been changed to the more accurate term "unmarked graves."
So when it comes to organizations pushing "unmarked graves" as "mass graves", the CBC itself is equally guilty. And of course "unmarked graves" itself is a lie that the CBC still refuses to correct: that same CBC story I just linked to that had to admit "mass graves" wasn't accurate links to this article when talking about "unmarked graves". Yet as readers to this blog know, not a single body has been found.
Zero bodies, so zero graves. The only case of "unmarked graves" is the Cowness incident where the Red Indians got very excited how ground penetrating radar had detected "possible graves"....in the cemetery. (Number of dead Red Indian kids found? Oh, right, still zero).
Fortunately, he's only 90% retarded, so Tony Davis thought to cover his bases in his story about Councillor Robertson:
Since the confirmation of community knowledge of suspected unmarked graves in British Columbia, First Nations across Canada have located evidence of the remains of more than 2,300 children in suspected unmarked graves at or near former residential schools and Indian hospitals, according to a report from the independent special interlocutor for missing children and unmarked graves and burial sites associated with Indian Residential Schools released earlier this year.
Re-read that first sentence again: since the confirmation of suspected unmarked graves. He wanted to say that they confirmed "unmarked graves", but even the CBC liars are starting to realize they are the boy who cried "Red Indians aren't jackpine savages with tuberculosis" a few times too many. So what did this confirm? That there was "community knowledge of a suspicion?" Did that really need confirming, and how does a test that even Red Indian activists acknowledge doesn't actually detect any remains confirm a suspicion? Shouldn't they try to confirm or deny the premise of the unmarked graves?
(Well, maybe not, every time they try this it ends pretty poorly for them).
Meanwhile, don't put much stock in this "report from the independent special interlocutor". You can read the report here [pdf]. Here's the "evidence" they discuss in the report, every reference is to a mainstream news article instead of original scientific sources. Basically Kimberly Murray wrote a blogpost in PDF format.
- The "215 dead kids in Kamloops" (no bodies discovered)
- "104 dead kids" at the Brandon Indian Residential School in Manitoba - the reference was a 2021 press release cleverly disguised as a news article: no actual bodies have been found, they immediately went into a "holding pattern"
- CowFace Indian Tribe "discovery" of a cemetary near Marieval Indian Residential School (no bodies discovered)
- Eugene’s Indian Residential School in British Columbia found "up to 182 bodies" (except, again, no actual bodies and strangely enough only 100 kids ever attended the school so where did the other 82 come from?)
- "160 dead kids" at the Kuper Island Indian Residential School in BC just off Vancouver Island - they "circulated a statement" but provided no actual physical evidence
- "93 dead kids" at William's Lake BC's St. Joseph’s Mission Indian Residential School. Except 43 of them again appear to be an actual cemetery so for all we know everybody "discovered" is white. None of the "93 bodies" has been ever actually found.
- "54 dead kids" spread between Saskatchewan's St. Philip’s and Fort Pelly Indian Residential Schools. But a hundred years ago they had a drunk principal, and a sex predator in the 60s, so that must obviously mean they also had a secret rash of mass murderers (but the alcoholism, that was a step too far and needed to be publicly dealt with). Four students are "registered" as dying between the two schools according to the flawed TRC report.
- At St. Bernard’s Indian Residential School another "169 potential unmarked burials". Why potential? Take three guesses why Chief Crying Liar can't claim anything else.
- Fort Alexander Indian Residential School found "190 anomolies" that cannot absolutely under any circumstances whatsoever be anything other than the bodies of dead Red Indian kids and no we aren't digging to prove it why would you ask?
- A whopping two thousand (yes, 2000!) "anomolies" at the Qu’Appelle Indian Residential School in Saskatcehwan. This time they may possibly actually have a body as they found "partial remains" of a "child between the age of four and six". No explanation of how a child below school age got there, or for that matter any proof it's not some white girl the search teams murdered for kicks. Fun fact, a rash of Red Indian gang murderers in 2007 may mean that more whites were killed by Team Lysol since Confederation than the other way around.
- Blue Quills Indian Residential School near St. Paul Alberta had "as many as 179 unmarked burials" which they could clear right up by actually finding what's inside. It was "accidentally found" in 2004, and yet still they can't find any actual bodies. They claim that bodies are magically found whenever a new grave is buried (oh, right, it's another graveyard) but proof is still nowhere to be seen.
Pretty compelling evidence, eh? Exactly...oh, right, still zero bodies. When "possibly partial remains" is your strongest piece of evidence, you have a problem. Not to mention that Red Indians already have been found to fabricate bones when real ones remain annoyingly elusive:
In April 2011, encouraged by Annett’s claim in Hidden No Longer that he knew exactly where bodies were buried at the former Mohawk Institute in Brantford, the Mohawk Nation of Ouse/Grand River invited Annett to lead a search for unmarked graves. According to Annett’s account in Murder By Decree, interviews with former students, ground-penetrating radar searches, and excavation took place that fall. But when Annett tried to pass off animal bones as those of dismembered four-year old children at an Occupy Toronto protest in November 2011,Annett was exposed as a fraud, and publicly denounced by the Mohawk First Nation.
How long before this latest case is again "denounced as a fraud?" Or have they learned better to never let any scientific analysis be performed this time to disprove their claim?
Regardless, this is the level of evidence that Kimberly Murray expressed in her laughable "report", which was then parroted by the CBC even though the CBC news stories themselves were her primary source. This is Steele Dossier level of re-laundering a false narrative through the media.
