The media has found a story that really has legs. Why?
It's about themselves. How could they resist?
Watson’s says his efforts to report on that person’s influence were stymied, and that editors put him under “a six-week reporting ban” he only broke free of upon his resignation.Hey, remember when the newspaper published a story about you having an argument with your boss about something where he told you to do something else?
Also, keep your bullshit detector functioning when you read this phrase from the article:
“distorted and inaccurate accounts” of that discovery, which allegedly originated with a person close to the Prime Minister’s Office who also has influence within the Star