Why Andy Dick in Edmonton proves Donald Trump right

It was about four years ago now that the infamous "Trump locker room audio" was the big story. I didn't get around to commenting on this before the 2016 election, but you know what they say, better late than never. If you've forgotten, the big thing that gets feminist harpies panties in a twist is this quote:

Trump: "Yeah that's her with the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful... I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything."

Bush: "Whatever you want."

Trump: "Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."

Now the first thing a rational person does is notice how Trump subtley has moved from the first person to the second person. He goes from "I just start kissing them" to "You can do anything" which comes after the imperative sentence: "grab them by the pussy". Imperative sentenes always default to second person, but even if they don't Trump helpfully says "you can do anything" both before and after using it. For all the leftists who insist this proves Trump grabs women by the pussy (remember leftists are never the 'rational people' referred to earlier), it really doesn't. The only ballsy move Trump explicitly refers to himself doing is "I just start kissing them".

Have you ever used the "just start kissing them" move? I have. Lots of people have. It's a good move. You're on a third or fourth date with a pretty girl, there's clearly some chemistry and awkward pauses, and you use one of those pauses to lay one on her. The consent fetishers go nuts by even suggesting it, but it's not exactly an unheard of manoeuvre. Hell, Princess Leia did it to Luke. I just rewatched National Treasure last week and Ben Gates gives one to Abigail. I'm sure if you went through movie kisses before the woke era you'd find at least half of the men's first move was just the sudden kiss.

The second thing our rational non-leftist will notice is that what's Trump's talking about isn't what he does or what Billy Bush does or even what he's ssying male celebrities do. It's instead what celebrities are being allowed to do. It's pussy-grabbing in the passive voice.

Which brings us to Andy Dick.

Yes, that Andy Dick.

In April of 2005, Andy Dick performed at Yuk Yuk's in what at the time was it's new Fort Road location. It didn't go well: he exposed his cock onstage and was booted out the door. This was his second show on Friday April 1st, his shows on April 2nd ultimately ended up being cancelled. What wasn't reported in the news, and as far as I know I'm the one first reporting this story to the world (15 years late, which is still faster than it took the Edmonton Journal to learn about the National Energy Program), is that after his comedy show was cancelled due to complaints he ended up on Whyte Avenue.

That night I'm out for drinks with Martok and Chang, specifically on the main floor of the Black Dog Freehouse. Who should show up but one Dick, Andy? Quite intoxicated and probably in a mood after being shit-canned from Yuk Yuk's, Andy Dick proceeds to go around the bar...and grab women by the pussy. And guys by their cock. As he goes from patron to patron he locks lips with them and starts to fondle them. In other words, he "just starts kissing them". "Like a magnet". He doesn't "even wait". And most of the people at Black Dog literally let him do it.

Eventually Chang of all people is the one who disrupts his Hollywood party by starting a chant of "Andy Dick sucks dick" which probably played a small role in him leaving the bar. But despite his behaviour and his intoxication he wasn't touched by a bouncer. "You can do anything" Trump said.

He was right. This of course is why the celebrity-obsessed left had to go through such pantomime moral preening: Trump had spoken a truth which they hoped would stay hidden. Celebrity culture has really left us with a two-tiered notion of right and wrong: when Ru Paul thinks he's a woman and parades his ugly ass in a dress we're supposed to applaud. What they do is always implicitly accepted, and if thousands of years of moral law and human decency say otherwise the celebrity wins out in the end. Ironically the ones who hate Trump the most for being a beneficiary of this policy are the sames ones who day after day live it.

Andy Dick does suck dick. But he in his own way reminded us that Donald Trump is right a hell of a lot more than he's ever wrong.



Remember, my preferred personal pronoun is "Better Than Any Faggot" and it's illegal in Canada to "misgender" me by referring to me by anything else.


Another Red Indian savage

Relatives in Wetaskawin have heard that he's from there, and that is that he's holed up on the Hobemma Reserve right now evading the cops.
Bluffton, Alberta – At 6:20 a.m. today, Rimbey RCMP responded to a complaint of an armed robbery at the Bluffton City General Store. At 6:05 a.m., a male suspect failed to pay for his gas and grocery purchases. When confronted outside, the suspect fired a shot from what is believed to a small calibre firearm which struck the store clerk. The clerk was transported to a hospital with a non life-threatening injury.


What about kids who don't want to become parole officers?

Remember: these far-left lunatics are teaching children their lies.

Today's candidate is named Renee Ouellette, a recent graduate in the fake degree known as "Native Studies", who made a "Cree language education package" that doesn't include phrases the modern Red Indian actually needs like "what hours of the day is this rural farm with the valuables in the garage unattended?" but instead the word for "carrot" and "apple".

By now I'm sure you've notice one of the problems. Carrots were totally unknown in Alberta until the white man showed up: while the plants themselves originated in Iran they became popular due to their consumption in Europe. The Europeans (like Columbus, who we celebrated earlier this week) who discovered America brought carrots with them.

But that's actual real history, not myth-making lies taught by "educators" so stupid they actually believe this:

We are on Treaty 6 land and it’s important for people to understand the stories, history and culture with the people who first inhabited this land.
The "this is Treaty 6 land" is of course nonsense, we've established this before. But if Renee is really interested in "the history and culture" of Red Indians than "carrot" shouldn't be on the list. Any Cree who grows carrots is in fact culturally appropriatng Iranian culture. A fatwa upon them.


President Trump is 10,000 times better than any Hollywood star. Now we can prove it.

Editors Note: this post was written in October 2017 but for some reason ended up stuck in draft status. As a result, 3 years to the day after it was supposed to go online we have reposted it as-is.

Do you stay calm, keep smiling and carry on as if he weren't repeatedly invading your space? Or do you turn, look him in the eye, and say loudly and clearly, 'Back up, you creep. Get away from me. I know you love to intimidate women, but you can't intimidate me, so back up.

Maybe not, huh?

This week Hollywood is (belatedly) lining up to denounce the man that they tacitly praised back when they didn't think you'd ever find out about what they always knew he did. The Hildebeast is shocked and appalled that what she knew Harvey Weinstein did has now been exposed. Kevin Smith is ashamed that the man he happily cashed cheques from is now publicly acknowledged to do what Kevin Smith has always known he did.

You may think I'm exaggerating. Nope. Kevin Smith's pal Matt Damon was one of the two A-list actors who pressured the New York Times to drop a story about his "well-known" abuses in 2004. "Progressive" twits like Seth MacFarlane and Tina Fey are now desperately trying to backtrack and claim their jokes were coded attacks. C-list actresses talk about how they were warned about Weinstein, yet nobody bothered to speak out. A-list actresses like Rose McGowan, Gwynneth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie, and Ashley Judd turn out to have been sexually assaulted by Weinstein.

Going back to the Hillary Clinton thing above, do these names sound vaguely familiar to you? They should. October 7 2016, almost exactly a year ago, Rose McGowan said "filthy" in response to media mis-reporting of an old Donald Trump audiotape. You know which audiotape of course.
I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything
The problem now is the same thing as the problem then, of course.
  1. Trump is mostly just talking up his game, seeing how earlier he admitted that he pushed to try to sleep with a woman and she wasn't interested in him. He didn't "just grab her by the pussy", he took her furniture shopping and struck out.
  2. Everything that Trump said was absolutely true. In fact, Rose McGowan has basically just admitted it.
That's really the thing to take from the contrast between Trump (who was never accused of sexual assault until the exact millisecond he started to become a credible threat to occupy the White House at which point Hollywood and the media ganged up on him) and Weinstein (who was endlessly being accused of sexual assault dating back a decade and a half but always had Hollywood and the media make the allegations go away): Hollywood leftists are projecting again. They're always projecting. Mark Steyn has just noted that Weinstein was the main voice for the Roman Polanski petition. When faced with a man who actually raped women, the Hollywood Left fall over themselves. When Trump makes a comment, it's proof if his crimes.


Giving Thanks to Christopher Columbus

Today is Thanksgiving in Canada, Columbus Day in America.

Down south, leftists have been very aggressive in trying to defame Columbus as some sort of evil slaveholder who destroyed the peaceful people who were here since time immemorial.

Martok a few years ago was talking with one of the "good Indians" as the old phrase goes: a guy who rejects this #IdleNoMore nonsense and wants to be realistic about what would have happened to North America without Columbus sailing the ocean blue in 1492.

Do Red Indians today really believe that it was only a unique "evil" of white Europeans that led to the lands they (now) claim as their own being seized by a colonial power expanding across the earth? Yes, though this really makes no sense on the face of it. For starters, over at L'Anse Aux Meadow there was already a European port being built (but ultimately abandoned). Meanwhile the Vikings routinely were sailing to Labrador to cut down trees as late as the 1400s, so it's not like if only that crazy Columbus hadn't believed the world was round and sat still in Portugal, nobody would have come out this way and the Red Indians would be sitting pretty all by their little lonesome.

In case you were unaware, by the way, Columbus didn't sail to prove the world was a sphere. That's been known since the dawn of sail, and the radius was even first calculated by Eratosthenes around 200BC. However there was some scholarly disagreement about how to turn Eratosthenes' stradia into feet which led to two different calculations of the Earth: Columbus belonged to the Ptolemy camp that believed his measurements were an 18000 mile circumference. As the American Physical Society remarks, had Columbus known the 25000 mile number he wouldn't have risked the trip.

Eventually somebody would have come out this way. Even if you presumed that Europeans didn't ever dare cross the impenetrable ocean in wooden sailing ships, did you think they would stay on the east side of the Atlantic even after (inevitably) building iron steamships? Eventually even without finding North America we would end up orbiting the earth and somebody might just remark "hey, look at that big continent in the middle of what we thought was an unending ocean from Liverpool to Tokyo".

But getting back to the aforementioned good Indian, his question to his kin was what they expected would happen when their stone aged society was found by a far more powerful and far more advanced civilization that came across them. There are a small number of "unconnected" tribes, but even then we're talking about people who don't chat with their more advanced neighbours rather than being totally isolated and unaffected by them: if no European settlers ever went north of Helena or west of Winnipeg and instead simply engaged in long-distance fur trading Red Indians would still be a nomadic people not ever really occupying any land. Face it, when other cultures discovered there was a lot of (essentially empty) land and resources they would be coming for them.

As it was, Canada was discovered by the British. While these days the Brits are scoffed at as "imperialist colonizers" in reality that was pretty much the best possible country to show up here: they made (and, despite the lies of activists, honoured the terms of) treaties even though in reality the tribes who they signed with had little or no actual claim over much of the land they were supposedly signing over. Unlike the French who slaughtered every Beothuk they could find in Newfoundland, or the Spanish who were notoriously bloodthirsty in southern and central America and within 50 years of Columbus had conquered the entire southern continent.

In fairness to the Spanish, they also had by far the more powerful and entrenched 'indigenous' populations to deal with. The Incas and Aztec were actual societies and while not technologically civilized they at least had a rudimentary legal system and standing army.

But what the good Indian brought up, which rarely gets discussed, is what if the Europeans never made it here at all? I sort of discussed this above, but only our own Euro-centrism makes us think of Europe solely the entity that would have made it out here. If there was some imagined cultural block of the Europeans sailing the Atlantic, that still doesn't count the other ocean. I mentioned Tokyo earlier and it wasn't by accident. What if, instead of being found by white Europeans, it was instead found by the yellow Japanese?

Japan was a fair bit behind the Europeans in naval technology and the Pacific is a more formidable ocean, so they weren't sailing it in 1492, or probably even 1592 (the Sengoku period ended in between 1560 and 1615 and that cultural change was also motivated by Europeans discovering Japan: we probably shouldn't allow for that contact in our imaginary world). The Edo period from 1603-1868 would likely be when a no-contact Japan started moving out into the world. While the real Edo period was socially isolationist, if everywhere south and west they sailed other cultures were found it would make sense to sail east. The coastal warships would be evolved into more rugged blue water units that would sail into Hawaii and the Aleutian Islands, and discover in both locations a primitive non-Japanese society that could be conquered easily, and viciously. Continuing east to the Pacific Coast of Canada and the United States they would discover a wild open and untapped wilderness ripe for the taking...with a few pesky non-Japanese tribes (basically Mongolians) to be eliminated. Violently.

If you didn't already know, here's a chart of how the Japanese consider other races. Note that their view of whites is coloured (to borrow a term) by how much whites have been able to culturally and technologically compete with them. Those Portuguese sailing ships and Spanish galleons arriving in Nagasaki 450 years ago are the only reason whites are with "everybody else".

Ask Korea or China or Indonesia or any other asian non-Japanese race if you don't believe me. The Japanese would consider the Red Indians as far beneath them as the Red Indians consider dogs, and with much the same ultimate fate: vicious and violent attacks that were not aimed at simply conquering territory but indeed obliterating the backwards non-Japanese people that were living there. Anybody below about 700 on that scale would be not worth keeping around. And since the Red Indians would still be a primitive stone aged people in 1750 without contact with the outside world, those same Japanese armies showing up in ever-increasing number wouldn't rest until they hunted down and removed every single shred of non-Japanese.

So whenever some crazed activist wants to rail about Columbus, remind them of the alternative: an entire continent being wiped out as efficiently as the Beothuk had been. South America might have been a different story, and the entire east coast might have ended up being a race as news of Japan's find reached Europe, but any Red Indians in Alberta owe their very existence today to Christopher Columbus and his discovery of...well...almost America...


The Soup Theory

From Commenter PlusUltra at The Z Blog:

Soup is the last stand of implicit White identity.

It is the final bulwark against the forces of darkness. Throughout the ages, soup has aided the white race in our endeavors of conquest and exploration. Across every frontier, soup has been by our side. From the coldest tundras to the hottest deserts and the muddiest of trenches, soup has been our saving grace in the great racial struggle. Its nutrients have provided us with the energy needed to stand at the apex of mankind.

But because we’ve turned our back on her, we’ve become as ordinary and weak as any other race. If we are to stand once again at the forefront of human progress, strength and conquest, we must once again make soup the cornerstone of our diets

In all honesty though I don't buy it. I mean literally, I don't typically buy soups. I'm not one of these people who opens a can of cream of broccolli in order to make a baked chicken. I laugh at the soup and lentils guy at the Whyte Ave Farmers Market (I don't think he's there this year but he is at the St. Albert one).

Is there a food that could be called the "final bulwark against the forces of darkness"? No, probably not. Is there a drink that could say the same? Probably not, but "shitty unflavoured vodka" is probably the correct answer.


Quick question for Jason Isaacs

Do you also support the death penalty for attempted murder? Jacob Blake, by the way, would qualify.

 How about manslaughter?

 Actual murder? 

Strangely enough, this is the first time the actor has ever endorsed capital punishment. It's illuminating to see how these fascists think.


I (heart) Residential Schools

Today is "Orange Shirt Day", when whiny far-left Red Indian activists try to make it sound like the Residential School system was a bad thing.

This is, of course, based entirely on a lie. Residential schools, in case you didn't already know, were simply how the British took it upon themsleves to exercise their treaty mandate of providing primitive savages with an advanced technical and cultural education. In fact, it was based on a system of education that, while considered horrible by modern "educators" who can't teach Johnny to read in a mere 12 years, was one of the main drivers of British exceptionalism around the globe: specifically boarding schools.

As this history of boarding schools in Britain and Canada notes:

When Thomas Hughes wrote Tom Brown’s School Days in the 1830s, he used Rugby School as the setting, a school that his readers would have seen as strikingly modern. As he admitted at the time, Hughes created the characters of Tom and Dr. Arnold to illustrate how to live a good life and, by analogy, how to build a great nation. All the classic elements of the boarding school novel were there: students mentoring each other, a strong and empathetic teacher, sports and, inevitably, bullying and corporal punishment. With the help of friends and the advice of Dr. Arnold, Tom defeats the bully and becomes a mentor himself. He doesn’t cheat on homework, he plays cricket, and life goes on. What would have struck early readers aren’t the things that strike us today. Corporal punishment, for example, would have seemed familiar, and not at all specific to boarding school.

Indeed, corporal punishment was still a part of public schools in Alberta into the 1990s. And there's of course nothing really wrong with that...spare the rod and spoil the child etc. etc 

Meanwhile boarding schools are away from home.

So already the two big "issues" that Red Indians and their far-left toys in the CBC always drum up ("abuse" and "ripping children from their families") isn't something at all unique to the Residential Schools: they were a common feature in the most advanced education system on the planet at the time. Indeed, this system was mirrored relatively closely in other British colonies: New Zealand, Australia, America, and India.

India provides an interesting case: in that country as well primitive non-whites were put into the British boarding school system...and thrived. Why do you think everything from your computer support line to your Revenue Canada phone scams are originating from over there? Given that IQs follow race more than country of origin, it's impressive that India is doing as strongly with their racial makeup as they are. Who to thank for that? British education.

It didn't "take" with Red Indians for some reason. We leave it up to the reader to figure out why on earth that might be.


Even Robert Duncan Macneil can't be bothered to remember Star Trek: Voyager

The actors who played Tom Paris and Harry Kim have started a Star Trek: Voyager podcast review show: Apparently though all the good bits are on their Patreon (which of course no conservatives should ever support).


Memo to @vexwerewolf, @chittlins, @Fire_Badger, @Elegant_QueenK, @chrysoleggyon, @baneslay, @anthonyackee2, @gmiller1643, & @anya_something

Today, looking at all the evidence, a Grand Jury decided that the officers involved in the death of Breonna Taylor did nothing criminal and would not be charged.

So naturally, niggers and their unhinged ANTIFA co-conspirators in Louisville immediately began trashing the city. As a result, the Kentucky National Guard has been deployed. This fact alone seems to convince leftists that something was wrong with what the Grand Jury decided (rather than, obviously, something being wrong with the niggers).

Poor "Mr. Rusty Nail", a Trump-hating liberal who slightly cares about the fundamental human rights of (non-white?) store owners, got in big trouble for this one. "Vex" falls into the basic far-left drivel about how caring about property owned by innocents should be less important than life held by criminals.

First off, as you may note, property is life: property is what we purchase with the fruits of our labours. Deny us that property, destroy that property, and you steal away days/months/years of a person's life. Claiming that we should be okay with hardworking innocent people being wontonly deprived of their property in favour of the "life" of somebody who has no respect for that property (and life) of the innocent is ludicrous.

Secondly, before you get the idea that this Vex dude is a devoted adherent to the sanctity of life...when he decides (with no evidence) that a "white supremacist" was the victim of a crime, his concern for human life evaporates away...

(readers curious to how cops "enforce white supremacy", remember that to these losers working a job and keeping your money for yourself and not losing it to thieving niggers is a "white supremacist concept")

Meanwhile, numerous far-left extremists seemed to be confused by the cause-and-effect relationship between nigger riots and the National Guard being activated:

There are more, and all of them seemed to make the same basic mistake: confusing authorities understanding of the backwards thinking held by violent niggers with authorities understanding of fundamental moral truths. To wit: they weren't bracing for unrest because they knew it was the "wrong decision" but because they know that violent and irrational niggers aren't smart and/or civilized enough to accept the decision without committing mass violence.

Ever since Rodney King and O.J. we've known that the tribal impulses of niggers for destruction is activated whenever one of their tribe doesn't get what they have decided is their "just" outcome by an evidence-based and rational justice system. In the hours before the O.J. verdict for example, LAPD were bracing for mass violent unrest: it never happened, because that same justice system decided (whether rightly or wrongly: it's worth noting that even rational and evidence-based approaches to decision making can ultimately be wrong) that based on the evidence available and the interpretation of the law the outcome would be the same outcome that the niggers would accept without going crazy. Had O.J. been found guilty by the courts, niggers would have violently rioted in the streets even though it's almost certain that O.J. was guilty of murder.

Similarly the Grand Jury, having looked at the evidence and the letter of the law, has decided that none of the officers are criminally responsible for Breonna Taylor's death. That decision is probably right, but regardless the fact that violent protests are expected by both authorities and the far-left Twitter mob who isn't smart enough to understand the motivation behind the expectations is enough to give anyone pause.

Let's consider a minor comparison: last week Edmonton police arrested a suspect involved in a "vicious" assault on a janitor at an LRT station. The race of the suspect was not provided, but let's pretend he was white. Let's also pretend that the arrest did not go well and this guy was shot and killed by EPS. As you know, I've had unkind things to say about corrupt Edmonton cops in the past, and I stand by them all. Let's say that based on the circumstances of the arrest it's iffy if the cops were justified or not. If the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT) and I disagree about that justification I might be upset, I might speak out, I might even write a letter to the editor or a blogpost. What I certainly wouldn't do, and wouldn't even dream of doing, was being upset on behalf of the white race for how they treated this white suspect. He ain't me. I might just as easily take the cops side against him.

So why, when black Breonna Taylor was killed during a police raid, do the niggers so loyally care about how she was treated? I alluded to it numerous times above of course: tribalism. Niggers can't accept that one of their own might be guilty and therefore the action taken against them justified. Before you get all excited, yes I know she committed no crime. But if you remember the saga of Lily Tran, similarly Breonna dated nigger thugs who were the kind of folks to get involved in police shootouts. She may not have committed a legal crime, but her choice of who she spread her legs for itself was a crime of poor judge of character: while not something any jurisdiction can prosecute (nor would you want to live in one that does), it was still a failing of morals and decision making that led to her death. As I wrote about Lily:

Remember thug-girls, the bling bling makes you feel great for a bit, and then your drug-dealing boyfriends get you pumped full of lead.
But that kind of thinking apparently is too logical for the average leftist, so they have decided that Breonna bears zero responsibility for why she got shot. They have confused legal with actual. It's not a crime to date a criminal, likewise (to use my old Lily Tran analogy) it's not a crime to stand in front of a Hell's Angels clubhouse wearing rival gang colours: but both actions are a good way to end up dead.

And while being killed by the Hell's Angels while standing in front of their clubhouse wearing rival colours would certainly be a murder, being killed by the Hell's Angels while standing in front of their clubhouse next to another guy shooting automatic weapons at them may very well not be a murder. Breonna was an unfortunate victim, yes, but the fact that she was killed doesn't mean of course that she was murdered. Anybody with the smallest amount of knowledge of biblical scholars discussing the Sixth Commandment should be able to grasp the distinction. Can @chrysoleggyon? Probably not.


The "root cause of the problem" is tribalism. When a nigger is killed by police, regardless of the justification, niggers turn violent and riot. How do you cure this root cause? Sadly, I don't know the answer. The psychology of how to fix the ridiculous racial cohesion that niggers maintain is beyond my considerable talents. It would be nice if I knew the answer: it would be wonderful if there was some sort of pill Trevor Noah could take and after swallowing it he remarked "you're right: I'm nonwhite and Breonna Taylor is nonwhite but we're also two different people in two different circumstances and I shouldn't take what happened to her so personally". Unfortunately it does not yet exist, and we're stuck in a world where niggers don't understand what the justice system is for. This might be news to A.D. Ackee but the purpose of the justice system is not to "listen to you after you protest once and change the rules because you don't like the skin colour mix of victim and perpetrator". While A.D. Ackee is correct that the justice system is supposed to provide justice, justice is not a synonym for "what leftist idiots want". Justice might set free the cops who shot Breonna Taylor same as it might set free the cop who kneeled on George Floyd's neck same as it might free the farmer who shot Coulten Boushie.

Justice gets it right sometimes, wrong other times, but it also (almost by definition) gets what it says it's supposed to get the vast majority of the time. It's a mistake to think it somehow didn't do the job just because leaders know better than Greg Miller how irrational niggers can be:

And finally of course, what's endless bleating about blacks getting shot while acting black without some idiot bringing the long-discredited myth of "systemic racism" into the mix? None of these are examples of "systemic racism": no matter how many idiotic screeds by far-left idiots @brandy_mancari or anybody reads, it does not exist and no examples of it can be found. Stop and frisk targets high crime neighbourhoods because niggers are orders of magnitude more likely to be criminals and niggers like to live together. US prisoners are majority nigger because niggers are orders of magnitude more likely to be criminals and tend to also be dumb enough to be easily caught. Low income housing is "under-funded" because it's folly to waste money giving housing to people who have never done any of the actual labours that would justify them receiving any money. I would argue low income housing is overfunded because the ideal level of funding is zero.

The fact is that Breonna Taylor's tragic death was not a criminal matter, anymore than it's your fault if you swat a mosquito and the sound of your slap causes a chain reaction which results in a car crashing into a pole killing the driver. Causing a death does not equate to murder and the result of the investigation is that sanity prevailed by backing up that basic fact.

Prevailed in the court house at least. Out in the far-left social media sphere, basic facts are thrown out the window by the angry progressives listed above and so very many others.

Bonus irrationality from the pre-sized brains of the Woke:

Protesters invited Black women to form a line at the front of the march as they continued east and called on each other to "protect Black women."
Doesn't that sound a lot like the negresses became a human shield?


David Mitchell FACLC on texting vs calling

David Mitchell asks when phone calls became so intrusive:

When and why did the very idea of making a phone call turn into something so intrusive?

When texting appeared, I suppose, but why?
Speak for yourself Mitchell. Years and years ago when I started being old enough to stay at home without supervision, one of the things I did when home by myself (besides think to myself "wouldn't it be wonderful if there was some sort of international network of computers I could look stuff up on") was enjoy not answering the phone when it rang because it was never for me.

Did we have call display and an answering machine? Nope, at least not at first. It didn't matter though because the call was never for me: unless it was my parents calling in which case anything they had to tell me could wait until they got home. Even if they were calling to say they'd be late, they'd be eventually so I just didn't pick up.

This was long before text messaging was a thing.
The point is, replying to an email is a massive chore. Replying to a text can be a small chore. Answering the phone, and having a quick chat is no chore at all, and nor is listening to an answer phone message, so let's not be afraid to do it.

After all, we managed it in the presumably more formal old days. People say that before mobiles we were less in thrall to our phones, but they're misremembering. If the house phone rang, it didn't matter what you were doing, you ran to answer it. And you answered it in its own special room of the house, whilst standing up
So much for the "no matter what you were doing" myth. It wasn't true for me and I'm sure I wasn't the only one. In fact I delighted in training myself to not go running to the phone like Pavlov's dogs.

Bonus David Mitchell on the telephone: I really wish I could get some idiots who think I want to talk with them on the phone more than once a year to stop calling more than once a week and then sounding mad that I don't want to talk on the phone. Ever.
I'm no good at all at getting people off the phone I'm terrible at doing that transition thing where you subtly indicate that although of course my true pleasure would be if this call could simply go on all day and long into the night to be ended only when one of us falls asleep or dies of starvation nonetheless in this imperfect world of ours...


David Hasselhoff Seth Macfarlane Roast Comedy Central

Editors Note: this post was written in August 2010 but for some reason ended up stuck in draft status. As a result, 10 years to the day after it was supposed to go online we have reposted it as-is.

Saturday night I watched the Roast of David Hasselhoff on Comedy Network. As I mentioned on Twitter, Canada's comedy network was able to include all the fucks they wanted, yet censored out an AIDS joke at Pam Anderson's expense.

Family Guy creator Seth Macfarlane was the host, and other than a way-too-long Simpsons related joke from Gilbert Gottfried and a few South Park gags, people left Macfarlane alone.

Because of this, I just while putting away dishes came up with a few gags that while not particularly red-band material, tear that liberal piece of trash up a little.

Seth Macfarlane, ladies and gentlemen, the luckiest man in Hollwood. You know, a lot of people don't know this, but Seth was supposed to be on one of the planes involved in 9/11, but missed it. So really, really, the luckiest man in Hollywood. He survived 9/11 and has no less than three hit shows on FOX -- well, two plus The Cleveland Show -- but that isn't what makes him the luckiest man in Hollywood. No, its because he's the only creative talent in Tinseltown who doesn't have to worry about having his work stolen by Seth Macfarlane
As I mentioned, The Cleveland Show is pretty bad. In fact, that show is so terrible that after its first airing Jesse Jackson called Mark Fuhrman to apologize.
Seth Macfarlane is a pretty liberal guy, we all know he loves to burn prominent conservatives. It's a little unfair though: if Sarah Palin was as simple as she was portrayed on Family Guy she'd be one of its writers.


I don't know why everybody's up in arms at me, I'm not the sodomist here

A classic...

Now that we can identify faggots in the US Army, is there some way we can help the Iraqis and Afghanis identify them too? #tcot


This day in (blog) history

Eleven years ago Tim Horton's came to New York City. Having seen Tim Hortons in NYC, it's...unimpressive. The lineup at MSG after a hockey game are all people in Leafs sweaters though.

Anyways, the joke I made was it was the 27,922,361st to do in New York City and #27,922,362 was "TBA"...

Who knew it would be 15000 people get together for a rally for niggers who think they are chicks (who probably total under 15 people in the entire state).


What, Me μεριμνάω?

When you do a Bing search for any Greek God in the pantheon, you'll see a listing of them all and notice one of them isn't quite like the others...

Strangely though when you do a Bing image search for Perseus that Alfred E. Neuman photo doesn't come up, so I'm unsure what the thumbnail is "tied" to. Alfred E. Neuman's Wikipedia page makes no reference to the Greek God, and vice versa.

Related (and speaking of tied): In 2009 Google Images had its own bizarre search result...


Free expression for me, but not for thee

Cisco Systems fires employees for disagreeing with #NiggerLivesMoreImportantThanSocietyMotherfucker during an "open" forum.

The "incident" at Cisco (read: people expressing well reasoned opinions) has been a microcosm of similar situations at other silicon valley companies, who are left to try and figure out how to posture to the public they are concerned about racism, while at the same time not laying off their entire staff. Some believe that protests at companies could be next if employees aren't "trained" to think the right way.

Kristen Clarke, the president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said: “Employers should be striving for zero tolerance when it comes to racism and discrimination, period. The protests we’ve seen in the streets have become part of our new normal and will eventually make their way inside workplaces if employers fail to meet the moment.”
Clarke is proposing the U.S. version of the Rachel Arab legislation I objected to last month.


Black fragility

How fragile are they?

You just put your knee on their neck for eight minutes and they suddenly can't breathe.

Be stronger.

Welcome to August


Almost as much hysterics as Voyager's captain

When you do a Bing search for Star Trek Voyager the preview is this word salad...

I challenge anybody to explain what half of this means.

In the 24th Century the Federation star ship USS Voyager has just been released for take-off and for a Deep-Space mission to the Badlands. The Badlands is the hideout for so-called traitors to the Federation. They call themselves the Maquis. The Maquis are mostly ex-Federation and some freelancers. Anyone who pays their barging? is their leader. Captain Kathryn Janeway is the chosen captain for this mission because of her training and experience. She requests to speak a prisoner and former Maquis helmsman called Tom Paris. (Tomas Eugene Paris) Because of Mr. Paris, his experience and knowledge of the Badlands, he is the perfect advisor to go on the Deep-Space mission. Mr. Paris is also the Son of the Commander-Admiral Paris, Head of Starfleet. Setting off for the Badlands, they find no Maquis ship what so ever. Not even a trace. Some while later, they get swept away off their 'feet' and are carried to the Delta Quadrant - 75,000 light-years from home. There they find a stating? which belongs to the Caretaker who lately takes care of an entire race called the Ocampa. A friendly-suspicious person called Neelix is hailing them and warning them to stay away from his junk. She makes a deal with Neelix and he can come on board. If it isn't for Neelix, they couldn't save the abducted Maquis and Starfleet Operations Manager Harry Kim from the Ocampa world. This world is threatened by a race called the Kazon. Through the Caretaker, they meet the Maquis and decide to become allies because the situation doesn't look promising. They eventually will get at war with the Kazon since they want to have the - already dying - Caretaker's station and destroy the Ocampa. Captain Chakotay rescues Voyager from destruction by the Kazon and destroys his ship in the process, by colliding it with the Kazon ship. They will form one single crew and rescue the missing B'Lanna Torres and Harry Kim. Kes, Neelix's girlfriend and Nelix himself will stay on board and serve the captain by becoming part of the crew. Maquis and Starfleet bond together, they set off on a 75 year journey to the Alpha Quadrant, where Earth is. Since some of the crew


The month dilemma

We're about to run into a problem.

As you know, on a lot of forms we tend to abbreviate months. It's easier to type and view, but especially in the computer era we like having narrow columns on spreadsheets. You can see in the example below that to abbreviate the months drops your space requirement by 47%:

The summer months cause a bit of a wrinkle though. May, for example, gets off easy: it's already only 3 letters long. What tends to happen is that people get larger spreadsheets with schedules that no longer show April dates by the time May turns to June. For example, many businesses have to align weekly plans which feed into monthly sales metrics. May 1st 2020 for example was the Friday of Week 18, so even though four of the five business days of that week fall within April, it counts as a May sales week (as seen below).

Now as your business is tracking your daily output compared to your weekly plan, you also want to know which sales month it falls in (which as we've established may not be the same month as the day you're looking at). Businesses might want to keep track of this daily data. That means a spreadsheet will be showing 25 lines of "May" workdays before switching to "Jun".

Meanwhile a managerial summary may only track the previous 14 days which means April ("Apr") will be long forgotten. June instead of Jun is only one extra letter and doesn't really add the space that "breaks" the sheet, as ends up happening in the example seen on the right. June eventually turns to July, and you can suddenly forget that you're supposed to be abbreviating all these months. That mistake works all fine and good, it doesn't really impact anything.

Yep, everything looking fine.

No problems at all.

We're going great.

Until now.

We're coming to the end of July, which is followed by August. Now things are getting weird. Do I go back and change all the July to Jul and June to Jun? Do I sneak extra width in and then make August the full month name? It really falls apart when it's September and I'm back to my wide columns again.

We had a sweet ride for the last three spreadsheet-entering months. But the rocky waters are ahead.


The Seinfeld Reunion


"I'm trying to create a Traditional Theory of Critical Theory"

The head writers of the Babylon Bee interview Woke Encyclopedia author James Lindsay. It's really worth your time and attention.


A fact check for @bacciogelato

No, Kim, you believed the lie.

Whites saved Red Indian children from their shitty savage parents and educated them in a way their inferior stone-aged culture never could. In fact, that education was exactly what their elders demanded via the treaties.

The 'beatings' were merely corporal punishment, which was the same standards whites used when sending their own children to boarding school. You're a retard Kim. Educate yourself.


Remembering Kelly (twice)

Hey, did you ever hear of Kelly Kelly?

No, not the wrestling character played by Barbara Blank: I'm talking the 7 episode TV show starring Shelley Long. I was a big Shelley Long fan (I typically give up on Cheers rewatches about the time Coach dies, the only Rebecca storylines I like are the Robin Colcord ones because Roger Rees is just awesome), and she even made Money Pit watchable (Hanks was pretty terrible in it).

I never heard of this show until I just happened to see a promo on an old VHS tape. It starred Robert Hays (Striker from Airplane!) as a fireman who married Shelley Long's character Kelly, but his last name is Kelly and therefore you just figured out the name of the title. The only other notable about the cast is that a grown up Chrissy Seaver (Ashley Johnson, who oddly enough was later in two episodes of another sitcom that had the word "Kelly" in the name) played the obligatory hot daughter. Babylon 5's Claudia Christian was in an episode too.

It sounds like the Sound of Music inspired promo ad was the most creative part of the entire show. It's ranked #104 in IMdB's "cancelled catastrophes" list (the aforementioned Married to the Kellys is ranked #101 oddly enough). That sandwiches it in between Deadline starring Oliver Platt, and Brother's Keeper starring absolutely nobody you've ever heard of.

So at least they can say they're considered better than Father of the Pride (the animated show about Siegfried and Roy's soon-to-be-vicious white tigers), Fat Guy Stuck in Internet (a lame Tron ripoff where a computer hacker gets sucked into the internet and an evil CEO tries to get him killed in cyberspace), and two horrible Andy Richter sitcoms (Andy Barker, P.I. and Quintuplets).

Strangely enough, ranked at #32 (so worse than Kelly Kelly is Heartland, the sappy Alberta-based drama which definitely was not cancelled: it has over 200 episodes and has run longer than The Beachcombers or Street Legal.


"Virtue has a veil, vice a mask"

If you're in the States you can easily identify who's voting for far-left idiots in elections because they're the ones wearing masks.

Hiding from the world is a thing for them, it seems.


Advice for Scott Walker

Call their bluff. Say this:
"Wisconsin State Police should be massively defunded and they should be directed to no longer investigate fatal shootings of strangers within the homes of legal gun owners".

They want more Trayvon Martins? Offer them more Trayvon Martins.


1970s America versus 2020 America

The husband and son of the (female) judge in the Epstein civil case have been attacked by a "brazen" gunman.

On Sunday night at the New Brunswick, N.J. home of U.S. District Court Judge Esther Salas, a triggerman murdered her 20-year-old son with a bullet through the heart and critically injured her defence lawyer husband.

Four days before the brazen attack, the judge had been assigned to an ongoing lawsuit launched by Deutsche Bank investors who claim the company made false and misleading statements about its anti-money laundering policies.

More eyebrow raising is the allegation the bank failed to monitor some of its high-risk customers — including sex monster Jeffrey Epstein.
I'm reminded of a case I read about in David Yallop's famous 1984 book In God's Name about the death of Pope John Paul. In it was discussed the difference between the (1970s) American and (1970s) Italian justice systems. Michele Sindona, a Sicilian mobster and "P2" freemason (who Yallop believes was involved in the murder of John Paul I) is having some legal troubles in the good ol' US of A:
The first was the evidence given at the extradition proceedings by a witness named Nicola Biase. Biase was a former employee of Sindona and his evidence was deemed to be dangerous. Sindona set about making it ‘safe’. After discussing the problem with the Mafia Gambino family a small contract was put out. It was to be nothing particularly sinister. Biase, his wife, family and lawyer were to have their lives threatened. If they succumbed to the threats and Biase withdrew his evidence, the matter would rest there. If Biase refused to co-operate with the Mafia, then the Gambino family and Sindona planned to ‘review’ the situation. The review did not augur well for the continued good health of Biase. The contract for less than 1,000 dollars would be amended to a more appropriate one. The contract was given to Luigi Ronsisvalle and Bruce McDowall. Ronsisvalle is by profession a hired killer.

Another contract was also discussed with Ronsisvalle. The Mafia advised him that Michele Sindona required the death of Assistant United States District Attorney, John Kenney.

Nothing so clearly illustrates the mentality of Michele Sindona as the contract that was put out on John Kenney. The attorney was the chief prosecutor in the extradition hearings, the man leading the US Government’s attack on Sindona’s continued presence within the United States. Sindona reasoned that if Kenney were eliminated the problem would disappear. It would act as a warning to the Government that he, Michele Sindona, was objecting to the heat. The investigation should cease. There should be no more irritating court appearances, no more absurd attempts to get him sent back to Italy. The thought processes at work here are 100 per cent Sicilian Mafia. It is a philosophy that works again and again in Italy. It is an essential part of the Italian Solution. The authorities can be cowed, and are. Investigators replacing a murdered colleague will move very slowly. Sindona reasoned that what was effective in Palermo would work in New York.

Luigi Ronsisvalle, although a professional murderer, baulked at accepting the contract. The fee of 100,000 dollars looked good but Ronsisvalle, with a deeper appreciation of the American way of life than Sindona, did not envisage having much opportunity to spend it. If Kenney were murdered there would be waves, big ones. Ronsisvalle began to seek someone, on behalf of the Gambino family, who fancied his chances of survival after killing a district attorney.
The idea, of course, is that unlike in Sicily an American jurist being assassinated would result in billions of dollars being devoted to dedicate the entire stretch of the U.S. justice and policing systems to bring the killer to justice.

But that was 1970s America. This is 2020. It will be interesting to see if the attack on Salas is treated by American justice the same way that Ronsisvalle presumed an attack on John Kenney would be.


Donald (insert name here)


CSI Pegasus Galaxy

"Vegas" is listed by Episode Ninja as the 11th worst episode of Stargate Atlantis with a rating of 7.29? Yes that's right, the worst, not the best.

This isn't just a quirk of the ratings system either: Reddit user /r/Waylain got a lot of agreement for calling it the worst episode. The IMdB page for "Vegas" is higher at 8.2/10 but that still puts it lower than the next and final episode "Enemy at the Gates" and several other Season 5 episodes.

It seems very shocking that the episode is rated so low seeing how it's one of the most entertaining and enjoyable episodes. I think part of it is that the fans of the show don't like things that are narratively different: "The Real World" (where Torri Higginson's Doctor Weir has the requisite Buffy the Vampire Slayer-style "in a mental hospital where the real world tells you that the fantastic TV show the character is in is a delusion) is the 4th worst episode according to the popular ranking site.

This is somewhat all shocking. "The Real World" isn't the greatest episode SGA ever did, but it's certainly in the top half of their episodes rather than the bottom 20th. It has Cameron from Ferris Bueller's Day Off for crying out loud! Again, it's a different type of story than most of the other episodes and therefore is shunned. This is the only way to explain the low rating.

For those who don't know, Stargate Atlantis is in general a sci-fi show about humans who travel to the lost "continent" of Atlantis (actually a large city that can become a spaceship) which is actually sitting on an ocean in the "far-off" Pegasus Galaxy (which is actually a member of our Local Group and is only a dwarf galaxy but close enough). The ancient civilization who created Atlantis also created a network of wormholes between planets (entered through the eponymous Stargates) within Galaxies and therefore our human heroes travel the Pegasus galaxy having adventures. An evil group called the Wraith who inhabit Pegasus Galaxy and consume humans are the primary antagonist (who 10,000 years ago defeated the Stargate builders and chased them back to our galaxy).

That's the setting for most of the series. "Vegas" takes a different track: inspired by CSI, it opens on Earth where the main character from Stargate Atlantis (Joe Flanigan's John Sheppard) is investigating a crime scene in the deserts outside of Sin City. In most episodes Flanigan's character is an Air Force officer working in Atlantis, in this episode set in an alternate reality he's a lackadaisical detective disillusioned with the world. The victim appears to have been killed in the same way that the Wraith kill their victims: "feeding" off of them by sucking life energy out of the human's chest with a mouth-like appendage on the hand. The general populace in the main series are never told about aliens and this is true in this alternate universe as well: none of the cops can figure out what happened. The style is very CSI-ish: Flanigan is wearing sunglasses just like Caruso always wore, and as the cops look at the scene and describe the evidence we flashback to quick cuts of the actual crime being committed. The regular TV theme is cut short as well.

We start seeing regular Stargate Atlantis characters almost immediately: Jewel Staite's Dr. Jennifer Keller appears as the coroner at the start of the first act. Most of the SGA actors appear (Rachel Luttrell and Jason Momoa are credited by SAG rules but never appear), though in the alternate timeline we're never sure who's involved where at their first appearance). We watch the next victim sick in his hotel room having to confront his noisy neighbour who turns out to be our Wraith killer. Woolsey (Robert Picardo) shows up as an FBI agent basically just for "hey lookie" moments, and as Sheppard investigates the hotel victim we see the Wraith rocking out to Marilyn Manson as he applies heavy makeup to just look like a weird goth guy and hits the town. Is it the music that upsets people? They cut from "Beautiful People" to Rolling Stones, admittedly the music montages don't feel sci-fi but that's sort of the point. Sheppard tails Goth-Wraith through some in-casino B-roll and joins the same high-stakes poker game run by very stereotypical mob tough guys.

It turns out the Wraith in this reality have psychic powers they don't in the main TV show reality and Goth-Wraith cleans up in the poker game. Sheppard seems to intuit that he's always going to lose, which causes a confrontation ending with Goth-Wraith beating up everybody in the room as Sheppard chases him through the streets. Witnessing Goth-Wraith's superhuman abilities that allow the creature to evade capture leads Sheppard to search Goth-Wraith's hotel room, finding the latest victim and various other future clues. This is where the CSI aspects of the episode mostly fall off: Woolsey returns to turn this more sci-fi: Sheppard is taken to Area 51 where we see Rodney Mackay (David Hewlett) who fills him on on the science fiction world and also the backstory of this John Sheppard (not quite as fortunate as his "real" counterpart). Stargate Atlantis has done a few parallel world episodes before, and while it's not clear it appears this MacKay met an alternate reality John Sheppard from a parallel reality closer to the "normal" one than this one, but still not the same one from the main series.

Between MacKay and Goth-Wraith's flashbacks, we learn that a Wraith invasion of Earth was recently thwarted and Goth-Wraith appears to be one of two survivors, the other being the Wraith "Todd" (Christopher Heyerdahl) who has several appearances in the series. This one uses his psychic power to talk about the thoughts of Goth-Wraith couched as seeing the future though we don't know it at the time. Instead MacKay explains that Goth-Wraith is building some sort of alien device for an unknown purpose: it's exposing him to high doses of radiation which is why he keeps feeding on human victims and therefore regenerate his health. Sheppard overhears Mackay and fellow scientist Zelenka (David Nykl) debate possibilities of the device's purpose: MacKay insists it's going to be an intergalactic distress beacon that would require a lot of power. Regardless they need to find Goth-Wraith before he enacts whatever he's planning, and MacKay lets Sheppard go after giving him an "alternate you was awesome I met him" pep-talk that usually happens in these episodes. The Star Trek Enterprise episode "In a Mirror, Darkly" did much the same thing: the alternate universe versions of our heroes get told how awesome the folks we're used to seeing every week age.

Back in Vegas Sheppard rolls up his iconic Johnny Cash poster and quits his job, for...some reason. And then the Man in Black himself plays. Remember that I said the music was maybe one of the things that upset people? That seems to be the case here even though what we get is undeniably awesome: Cash's cover of Neil Diamond's second best song "Solitary Man" plays as Sheppard drives across the desert thinking about all of the disparate clues he saw within the episode. Getting his silent epiphany he does the mid-highway spinout and returns to track down Goth-Wraith.

Back at Area 51 the rest of the cast are trying to track Goth-Wraith down (with the requisite Robert Picardo Star Trek joke) only for Sheppard to report success: Goth-Wraith is in his airstream about to tap directly into the powerlines feeding from the Hoover Dam towards Vegas. They dispatch the legendary A-10 Warthogs to take care of the airstream. In the meantime though Sheppard and the Wraith engage in a gunbattle which buys the planes time at the cost of Sheppard's life. The distress beacon activates but is destroyed before it can do much damage...all that happens is a small wormhole is opened and the distress signal is sent into an alternate reality (to this alternate reality). The day is saved.

Well for this reality. A certain alternate reality fans of the TV show are familiar with kind of gets screwed.

So what makes the episode great? It's got a real sense of fun. Not the campy wink-wink fun of episodes like the Stargate SG1 100th and 200th episodes, rather a more pastiche of another series. I don't even watch CSI but getting a different kind of story and the actors playing slightly twerked versions of the ones we already know is always enjoyable. There's great actors (the mob bosses were all Sopranos veterans) and great action and it ends with Sheppard slowly dying to Johnny Cash knowing he's done well by the universe that previously had been screwing him over. Again much like "In a Mirror, Darkly" a lot of the fun is from the writers and producers being able to do a "kill off major characters" plot due to the alternate universe conceit, which is why both episodes stand out from what can be stifling in-universe continuity issues for "main" episodes. Still, I've probably watched "Vegas" more often than any other Stargate Atlantis episode and the pulpy nature of the story is a huge contributing factor.

Stay tuned for our next Stargate Atlantis coverage where we review a truly terrible episode...okay, probably not likely. It would be the one with the Pegasus Tribunal right? Or maybe the one with the lame Ghostbusters 2016 style all-female team shoved down our throats because Nicole de Boer is hot.


"With the click of a button, I could wipe out any conversations emanating from the regular old plebs who are the Twitter version of flyover country"

Andrew Lawton, the pride of London Ontario, eviscerates the media gatekeepers in the wake of the recent Twitter hack:

While the checkmark may seem – and ultimately is – laughably insignificant, it's the symptom of a bigger problem and the cause of another.

Twitter's stated purpose for blue checkmarks is to demonstrate an "account of public interest is authentic." Those in the media (who comprise the bulk of blue-check holders) tend to view a checkmark not as a symbol of authenticity but rather of ascension to some higher moral or intellectual stratum.

Perhaps the great Blue Check Lockdown of 2020 was a cosmic penance for the collective self-righteousness of the group – we may never know.

Coming in the middle of this year's unending mass cancelation, it was, I'd say, a welcome episode to see the elites who find perspectives other than their own repugnant forced to sit on their hands, even if only for a short time.
It's why the graduates who populate most newsrooms are so woefully unequipped to write about national trends when a majority are from liberal, coastal states and have never seen a farm, fired a gun or stepped foot on a factory floor.

The state broadcaster in my very own deranged dominion of Canada was busted (by me) a few weeks back for broadcasting a children's "news" segment calling J.K. Rowling "transphobic" for daring to suggest only women are capable of menstruation.

The network later said the segment didn't meet its journalistic standards (that CBC has standards is, in and of itself, newsworthy.) I don't doubt that there were producers and writers from downtown Toronto who were genuinely shocked that anyone could possibly believe what Rowling did.

The answer to the divide is dialogue and debate. The answer is to engage with the culture rather than run away from it. The answer is to keep fighting. But in spite of that, I won't deny that it was nice, for a couple of hours this week, to see the silencers silenced.


Two (Bing) girls, one (Bing) cup

Last month I wrote about drinking a beer with various Star Trek actors. With that post I made a quick and dirty photo mockup to go along with it (and no I'm not talking about Nicole de Boer in a bra and panties).

Not meaning to go inside baseball, but I needed a photo of two men at a bar. So I go into my search bar (defaults to Bing) and enters "two men at a bar".

So, uh...this is what comes up.

Then you switch over to Google, same search, and suddenly everything looks normal...

(click both pictures to view full-size)


Edmonton ESKIMOS

Always the Edmonton ESKIMOS.

Never buy tickets or merchandise for anything else. Never stop cheering any other name.

Unless they change it to one of the following:
Edmonton White Men are Superiors
Edmonton Redskins
Edmonton Engines (say it 5 times fast and you'll get it.

The 1793 Project

Years ago I considered a post that would discuss how, thanks to Rachel Arab's expanded "workplace harassment and violence" laws, Alberta businesses would be forced to undergo far-left ideological adoption of the sort of safe space snowflakeism that permeated college/university campuses.

I never wrote it. But last month Robby Soave did:

While some critics have dismissed the idea that the antics of safety-obsessed college students matter very much to the broader culture, I've long warned that the small number—proportionally speaking—of young people inclined toward these tactics could do serious damage elsewhere. As I wrote in my book Panic Attack, "It's not impossible to imagine the same kind of thing happening in the workplace: picture a boss who is afraid to reprimand negligent young employees out of concern that they will say their PTSD is triggered."

Recent events at The New York Times are an almost perfect demonstration of how this is playing out. Staffers angry about an op-ed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R–Ark.) claimed that its publication threatened their very lives. They specifically chose "running this puts black Times staff in danger" as their mantra because it invokes workplace safety. When the authority figure—the boss, the principal, the government—is responsible for ensuring safety, and safety is broadly defined as not merely protection from literal physical violence but also the fostering of emotional comfort, norms of classical liberalism will suffer. (One activist told me that for him, safety requires other people to affirm him.) The Times conflict ended with opinion page chief James Bennet out of his job.
Soave doesn't tie it into "workplace harassment" legislation, but perhaps that's because in the bellweathers of broader far-left U.S. culture it is no longer even necessary.
Ironically, the same subset of people ostensibly exercised about emotional safety—the woke left—seem frequently inclined to level unsubstantiated accusations that inflict emotional harm. This makes it difficult to believe that these Twitter warriors' true aim is the promotion of psychological comfort. Did any of them consider Uhlig's mental health after the man was baselessly accused? Does anyone care about Roman, who probably did not expect her enemies to ransack her Myspace page for evidence of racism and then pillory her for a photo taken when she was 23? What about Shor, thrown to the wolves for making a reasonable objection to what one wing of the protesters was doing?

That sounds like terror, not safety. Call it the 1793 Project.


A look back in angora whyte

From 2013, pictures of Whyte Ave at night. I think I've met that asian chick about halfway down who's on the left with her mouth open with her friend.

Don't bother reading anything else by the lying scum of an author though.

This is what free speech looks like

I am totally 100% opposed to the RCMP "investigating" a letter that merely expresses in a crude graphic that catch-all putdown: "drop dead".

This was not a specific or even general threat: it was simply saying "this is what I think of you". Even in far-left Canada that legally falls under protected speech and obviously morally falls under the acceptable realm of political expression which must be allowed to be expressed.


Not even in a panic did we need fake meat

A few days ago I talked about how I'm finally breaking into my supplies purchased during the Wuhan Flu hoarding era.

I know I took some photos of baking aisle without any shortages except for flour, but try as I might I couldn't find where it was. I did find a picture of empty shelves somebody else sent me and used that in the post instead.

What I also found were a series of photos of empty meat shelves during the pandemic...except for one conspicuous product.

(click to view full size)

I'm really unsure how Beyond Meat still had any stock market valuation after all this.


Romulan A.I. research



Black art sucks

Hey, is maybe the reason nigger artists aren't as successful as they think they should be at all related to how shitty their art is?

This one looks like Floyd's 6yr old daughter drew it in between her being told lies about her criminal daddy.

This one is called "I See God in Us/Trinity" rather than "three fat negresses apparently looking into a crystal ball.

Are there any good pieces of art? This one isn't bad, but it's also just an artist representation of an already well-known character. It's only interesting because of the white-man created media property you associate with it.


"Oh My God!"

If you play any amount of FTL you have at least one and possibly two keys binded to "pause" (middle mouse button and spacebar for me). As a result, it's also amazing when you watch how far RedLetterMedia's Rich Evans progressed without pausing the game...

UPitt black-only graduation

Story: Students Demand Pitt Eliminate Free Speech Protections

Black Pitt, which did not return a request for comment, went further than merely targeting speech on campus. The list of demands includes a black-only graduation, an overhaul of university curriculum to be more "inclusive and comprehensive regarding the plight and triumphs of black people" and to "include the black narrative," an established master's and Ph.D. program in "black studies," and for the university to sever ties with the city of Pittsburgh's police department.

Meme: (click to view full-size)


June 2020

There will possibly never be a month for this blog like June of 2020. 112 posts over 30 days for an average of a post every 6 hours 25 minutes 43 seconds.

As I warned at the 3000th post, this wasn't going to be sustainable long-term: I expect in July to start scaling back and even moreso in August. Summer vacations will do that, you know.

Alternate theory

Dozens of Winnipeg women, desperate enough to sleep with ugly Winnipeg men, try to save face by claiming they were given a roofie.

No I'm serious: having been to Winnipeg a few times (I was, pre-COVID, supposed to be there this summer actually) and talking with Winnipeg girls who have, not meaning to stroke my own ego, thrown themselves at me because of hot I was by virtue of clearly not being a local, this theory is easily more common than the CBC "oh woe is woman" talking point.


The most insane cancel culture twist

The country music band Lady Antebellum, who changed it to "Lady A" because apparently it offended #NiggerLivesMoreImportantThanSocietyMotherFucker, has now sued the (black) singer already known as Lady A for not letting them have the name she already was using that they just decided is theirs.

On June 11, members of the band Lady A (Hillary Scott, Charles Kelley and Dave Haywood) renounced their name saying when they formed 14 years ago, they didn't consider the pre-Civil War "associations that weigh down this word," including ties to slavery.

Wouldn't it be something if, when this all ended up before a judge, he ruled that they legally had to change their name back to Lady Antebellum?

Fake News

Tell us exactly what was on the poster, CBC.

You won't, of course. You won't allow comments on the video for the same reason.

Because if we saw the actual poster we'd know it wasn't a big deal. You're lying fake news.

Kill yourselves.

Baking powder

Can't find my picture of the aisle amply supplied of everything else, so I have to use this donated photo instead.
Hey remember when "baking supplies" were being emptied from store shelves for some obscure thing called...hold on let me confirm...a "COVID-19"?

One of the things that I had noted at the time was that it wasn't really "baking supplies" that were being emptied out. It was flour. Just flour. If you wanted yeast, brown sugar, baking powder, baking soda, condensed milk, etc. it didn't really affect you. This stuck me as more than a little strange: what on earth were these people making?

CTV made it all about homemade artisanal bread which I think was only a dozen people with active Instagram accounts. This all happened just after toilet paper and I think everybody just started hoarding flour because they noticed some random post of empty shelves of flour. Anyways having heard that flour was running low (in grocery stores mind you, Bulk Barn always had plenty of flour including the much superior barley flour) everybody just started mass hoarding flour in case they ran out. Why did they need flour? They just did. As I joked at the time, there can't be that many people needing to make gravy or roux.

Regardless the point of this story is that when this baking supplies shortage began to be a thing, I succumbed. I also gave into madness, as it were. You see, I noticed that my container of baking powder was getting low and thought I should buy a backup. So I bought a second pack of baking powder. And today, finally, I used up the last of my baking powder and needed to open the one I had previously bought.

I'm still waiting to open that extra package of toilet paper I bought in late March though.


Sir Humphrey on far-left hypocrisy

From the classic Yes, Prime Minister episode "The Bishop's Gambit" comes this exchange about a socially conservative Anglican pastor and why he is dangerous to governments as a Bishop with a seat in the House of Lords:

Humphrey: He's also against oppression in Africa.

Hacker: So are we.

Humphrey: But he's against it from black AND white governments.

Hacker: Oh. You mean he's a racist?

You can watch it yourself at roughly 26:05 in the video below:

Female-centric cities would have buildings that leak once every 28 days

Yesterday Rush Limbaugh opened his show talking about this article from (of course) The Guardian:

Glass ceilings and phallic towers. Mean streets and dark alleys. Road names and statues of men. From the physical to the metaphorical, the city is filled with reminders of masculine power. And yet we rarely talk of the urban landscape as an active participant in gender inequality. A building, no matter how phallic, isn’t actually misogynist, is it? Surely a skyscraper isn’t responsible for sexual harassment, the wage gap, or even the glass ceiling, whether it has a literal one up top or not?

That said, our built environments can still reflect patterns of gender-based discrimination. To imagine the city and its structures as neutral places where complicated human social relations are staged is to ignore the simple fact that people built these places. As the feminist geographer Jane Darke has said: “Our cities are patriarchy written in stone, brick, glass and concrete.” In other words, cities reflect the norms of the societies that build them. And sexism is a deep-rooted norm.
Here's the thing: expanding cities and draining people out of the rural areas was the left's idea
Remember urban sprawl? The solution was supposed to be, yes that's right, large cities with buildings stretching high into the sky. The Guardian article has a photo of the Chicago River: when you take a Chicago river tour you might hear the tour guide excitedly talk about how, sure the majestic Trump Tower is the second-tallest building in the city (after the Sears Tower, of course), but the under-construction Vista Tower will be the 3rd tallest building in Chicago and the tallest skyscraper in the world designed by a woman. So "masculine and phallic" is something women are getting into too. Surprise surprise, women like a giant phallus as much if not more than men do.

Hilariously enough, one of the distinguishing features of this phallic building designed by a woman is "blow-through floors"

So after demanding an end to urban sprawl, now the demented left doesn't like how urban densification involves a lot of buildings that look like erect penises. They hate the physical requirements of the very spaces they demand.

Donald J. Trump's July 3rd speech

Tucker nails it:

The full text. It's really quite amazing.

We will state the truth in full without apology. We declare that the United States of America is the most just and exceptional nation ever to exist on earth. We are proud of the fact that our country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles and we understand that these values have dramatically advanced the cause of peace and justice throughout the world. We know that the American family is the bedrock of American life. We recognize the solemn right and moral duty of every nation to secure its borders and we are building the wall. We remember that governments exist to protect the safety and happiness of their own people. A nation must care for its own citizens first. We must take care of America first. It’s time. We believe in equal opportunity, equal justice, and equal treatment for citizens of every race, background, religion and creed. Every child of every color, born and unborn, is made in the holy image of God.