Albertan parents (for now) still have local control of their schools despite a Liberal's evil efforts

Great news out of the Legislature this week (so far 2014 has been good to us): Motion #503 by Calgary Liberal Kent Hehr, which would enshrine faggot-nonfaggot alliances as a permanent non-removable fixture of Alberta schools, was defeated. I know a few parents who were totally against this, so thanks to all of you who rallied your fellow parents, got a hold of your MLAs, and pushed them to vote against this despicable action. It's not easy watching the media coverage following this, I know, but your dedication and your courage will serve you and your kids well in the years ahead.

Not that you're necessarily in the clear: these GSAs still exist, still can form, and crucially still be officially endorsed by principals: so every time this topic comes up you're going to have to learn on them and the school boards to cut this nonsense off at the pass. The sheer relentlessness of the pro-sodomy crowd on this file is daunting: useless cocksuckers like Kris Wells, who's already supported by yours and my tax dollars to do nothing but push his sick agenda on kids all day and night (after all, it is how they recruit), are still appearing on local TV and radio (well supported by the uranist lovers in the mainstream media) telling outright lies about the defeat of Motion 503.

For one, as I mentioned above, these GSAs can still form. Contrary to what the fudge packers are telling you, the Legislature didn't vote "to ban" them, or even strictly speaking a "vote against them". All that happened was that the Government of Alberta decided not to use the hammer of legislation to force principals and school boards to accept these GSAs.

Now why would this be a problem, you ask? Liberals like the news team at CTV Edmonton trotted out the one pathetic woman who's upset that her son's idea of an extra-curricular group had to stay extra-curricular. I guess the principal met enough parents who were vocal in their objections that giving this horrible group official endorsements from the school had to fall off the radar. The GSA can stay in place, of course, just like any little clique. They just don't get to be the official fag-lovers club. Boo hoo. When I was in high school, everything from the chess club (disbanded after half a year, I kept winning all the games) to the Sci-Fi club (disbanded after half a year, I kept winning the trivia contests) to the tackle football games held at lunchtime just off school property (for some reason, this one lasted the longest) was all extra-curricular. If you wanted to have a group of kids who played tennis, or voted for the Reform Party, or applaud as perverted pillow biters take turns fucking each other up the ass, you just got together and started doing it. You never thought of going to the principal wishing you could be "officially sanctioned".

So why do the faggots want this? Easy: control. The GSAs are no good to them just as a bunch of kids who all get together because they are united between a common (and horrible) set of values. They need official recognition: their sick lifestyle needs constant promotion. Disparagers cannot be tolerated [that was a pun. get it? -ed], they must be up against officialdom. There can only be one accepted group when it comes to the question of whether homos are to be held up as desirable or not: their side. There's a reason this question never gets answered: it gives the game away. Putting the matter up to debate, with two different groups with two different takes on the issue, is completely unacceptable to the intolerant sodomite defenders. They keep losing when there's an actual argument, so they just throw up their hands, cry "hater" (while being completely hateful towards religious conservatives), and then fight through things like Motion 503 to ensure only their side is ever heard. That's one plank of attack. Another is, of course, having Kris Wells queering it up with a sympathic host on morning television, all the nodding and talking heads getting together and agreeing with each other and trying to pretend they have no opposition. Then, of course, parties with MLAs who listen to their constituents are passed off as "out of touch", like being in touch with the people of this province involves revoking their individual control over their own children's education.

If you doubt this, of course, get your kid in a school with a GSA to start a "Muslim-Christian-Athiest Alliance Against Legitimizing Sodom" (MCAAALS, which rolls kind of nicely off the tongue). See whether the principal gives them school resources to promote the club. You already know what the answer is, but I'd still love to see what happens when somebody tries. See if you can get useless liberals like Laurie Blakeman sobbing in public that your child's voice isn't allowed to be heard.

Probably the thing I'm most proud of is that I told you about these GSAs in 2009:

I quite rightfully call right out on here the hypocrisy of the anti-Bill#44 crowd. Every time I have stated that Alberta Teachers are already pushing a pro-uranist agenda on schoolchildren I have been the horrible monster for speaking the truth
I explained how these alliances, and the push to mandate them in your schools, is the intolerant pro-sodomite agenda's end goal and how they've given the game away. Now you know why they were so adamant that Bill 44 not pass: they had this disgusting nonsense coming down the pipe.

The other key question that nobody else is asking about Kent Hehr's motion is why it doesn't have any passages outlining how GSAs can be shut down for unacceptable conduct. We've already established the anti-religious credentials of the pro-faggotry set, so what happens if these GSAs decide to, say, burn a stack of bibles in the school parking lot? In Hehr's disgusting world of GSAs protected by legislation, what process do school boards and principals and parents have to censure a GSA? In the liberal brain, ask the question what happens if a GSA is taken over by a Muslim voting bloc that decides the GSA's new mission is to promote clitorectomies and stoning of queers in the town square? Who decides when the GSA isn't a "GSA" anymore? In the real practical world that real people live in, not liberal talking points like Hehr and Blakeman, if you give legislative protection to a group you're basically giving up any method of exerting control over them. Doubtless this is all part of the multi-faceted plan by the uranists and their allies. Wisely, enough MLAs figured this out and voted no.

Well, that's not strictly true. As I mentioned above, many parents got out their pens and their phones, and got a hold of their MLA to express their dissatisfaction with Motion 503. A great Milton Friedman quote Mark Steyn always likes to use is this one:
The way you solve things is by making it politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right thing.
You parents got on the horns, talked about these trends in your kids' schools, and politicians -- whether they wanted to or not -- listened. Your efforts doing the same about the ruinous changes to the Alberta curriculum are equally important, so please don't stop doing them. The important thing now is the pushback: when somebody wishes aloud the motion had passed, ask them why the don't believe that parents through their local school boards should have the final say in what happens and how within the classroom and the hallways of the schools. When you hear that a school has an endorsed GSA, get the principal who approved this garbage on the phone: tell him/her (use "her" when talking about the principal in the third person, by the way, regardless of the gender) that you find this endorsement unacceptable and ask if your child can arrange to get together with other right-thinking children and start a group opposed to fake sodomite marriages. If not, then make sure the school board is aware that you are aware of their active role in spreading a great evil and banning dissent since that sort of light is the antidote to this poison.

Speaking of Mark Steyn, today was also the "Day of Pink", where again "bullying" is fought by ruthlessly bullying anybody who doesn't think the same way as the organizers do. Mark Steyn's National Post article on the topic from a couple years back covers it very well, tying it into..wait for it...the faggot-nonfaggot alliances!
The GSA is all over the GTA (the Gayer Toronto Area), but in a few remote upcountry redoubts north of Timmins intolerant knuckle-dragging fundamentalist school boards declined to get with the beat. So the Ontario Government has determined to afflict them with the “Accepting Schools Act.”

“Accepting?” One would regard the very name of this bill as an exquisite parody of the way statist strong-arming masquerades as limp-wristed passivity were it not for the fact that the province’s Catholic schools, reluctant to accept government-mandated GSAs, are proposing instead that they should be called “Respecting Differences” groups. Good grief, this is the best a bigoted theocrat can come up with?
This Ontario legislation, of course, seems to be the "intellectual" inspiration for Hehr's motion.
When you shrink from punishing the bullies (as our schools do), when you pursue phantom enemies (as our “human rights” nomenklatura do), when you use the victims as a pretext for ideological advancement (as the Ontario government is doing), all that’s left is the creepy, soft totalitarian, collectivized, state-enforced, glassy-eyed homogeneity of “uniting to celebrate diversity” (in Peggy Nash’s words). So Canada will have GSAs from Niagara to Nunavut; and for the lonely and unsocial, the lumpy and awkward, real bullying will proceed undisturbed in the shadows; and ideologically-compliant faux-bullying will explode, as a generation of children is conscripted into a youth corps of eternal victimhood, alert to every slight, however footling. In New York, where children are bullied with gay abandon, the school board recently proposed banning from its tests 50 hurtful, discriminatory words such as “religious holidays,” “birthdays” and “cigarettes.” From such an environment come a cowed, pliant herd and a cadre of professional grievance-mongers, but not a lot of functioning, freeborn citizens.
A cowed and pliant group of statists may be Kent Hehr's dream of what Alberta would look like in the future. Fudge-packing Wells actually talks about the Alberta he wants to build: an Alberta full of people prohibited by law from speaking out against the disgusting lifestyle he has embraced and stopping him and his ilk from indoctrinating our children with this nonsense.

So kudos to the parents who got involved: kudos to the MLAs from both sides of the floor who voted to stop this nonsense. A giant middle finger and boo-urns to the MLAs who voted to strip parents of their ability to influence the operations of their children's schools. Shame to those in the media who misrepresent this story and this bill and ensure only the side they want gets the sympathetic coverage. Boo to those who are already laying the ground for their eventual flip-flop when this sick plan comes up again. And, as always, fuck you faggots. I notice that already you've vowed not to accept this, just as you did the 1999 motion where even the Liberal Party of Canada voted to preserve the ban of sodomite fake marriages. Well, two can play at this game. I still don't recognize your fake marriages, and never will. I won't conform to your wearing pink, or your faggy downtown parade, or any of that. The fight will never be over.

Motion 503 was defeated this week, but there will be more to defeat next week, and the week after that, and the week after that, until sanity is restored and we no longer have to deal with mushy liberals like Kent Hehr and Brian Mason. And that, of course, brings me to the unique form of crazy known as the Alberta Party. They have already come out firmly in favour of these offensive GSAs, irrationally insisting that that cannot change even if their members vote to change it. For those who are falling for the Alberta Party's silly little quiz be wary. Their leader has also taken crazy one extra step, allying himself with these sorts of idiots:
As I wrote when the "Lake of Fire" thing first confused Alison Redford:
Can we trust an Alison Redford gov't to respect religious rights?
Man, I nailed it pretty good on that one didn't I? After all, just a month ago the Red Redford Tories similarly defeated Motion 502, which would have stopped the government from bringing legal bear onto citizens who spoke out about controversial topics. They don't have much respect for your rights at all: they'll sell out your principled objections to win favour with the fickle ass-piracy crowd. This spitting on your freedoms come with, just like in the case of Murray Billett up there, complete ignorance as to where the Lake of Fire comes from. I already famously trashed Red Redford for apparently being shocked that Christians believe in Hell:
But to listen to the lovers of sodomites in the media and the left side of the spectrum, you'd think the sky had fallen. Which takes us, as the left side of the spectrum so often does, to Alison "Red" Redford. Here's what Premier Mom had to say about the blogpost:
"The fact that there are people who think that's a legitimate perspective just absolutely blows my mind," Redford told reporters at a Calgary campaign stop.

"I think they're shocking and I think it goes back to Albertans are about to decide who is going to govern their province. They are going to have to decide who their premier is. They're going to have to decide who the cabinet is," she added.

"If we have people like this making these sorts of comments in Alberta I think it's absolutely wrong and of course I disagree with it."
So to the people of Alberta who believe in homosexuality being immoral (ie. a strong plurality thereof), Red Redford's mind is blown that you exist. Uranist pedophiles and their teacher's union poisoning the minds of your children with their sick views on society? Oh, she's fine with that.
Billett is too. In fact, he's okay with it happening over your objections. The intolerance and ignorance of Hehr and his "Motion 503" allies is frightening. The fact that they and their sympathetic media have gotten this motion, and not the far more important Motion 502 into the news cycles, should tell you everything you need to know about the media priorities in this province. There's no wonder that nobody wanted to go on CTV Edmonton tonight with their story of having GSAs foisted upon their children against their objections. We've seen where their biases lie. Unfortunately, this kind of ignorance is hard to beat.

The artistic ones don't even have an excuse, either. Last Saturday marked the 20th anniversary of Kurt Cobain's death, and while I thrilled you then with a video I think I can do better. So for all the liberals too stupid to know that there is a real lake of fire, and that sodomites and those who support them are risking spending eternity in it, I give you this classic:

And then this classic..
Under a Redford government, will religious people and religious organizations be persecuted?